Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Tanya McGarry v Hunters Hill Council [2016] NSWLEC 1049 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 17 December 2015 Date of orders: 09 February 2016 Decision date: 09 February 2016 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: O’Neill C Decision: See (4) below
Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: alterations and additions to existing dwelling; height; landscaped area; conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Ms Tanya McGarry (Applicant)
Hunters Hill Council (Respondent)Representation: Counsel:
Mr P. Clay SC (Applicant)
Mr P. Brown solicitor (Respondent)
Solicitors:
(Applicant)
HWL Ebsworth Lawyers (Respondent)
File Number(s): 10866 of 2015 Publication restriction: No
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.
-
The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.
-
In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to, and have not, made any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.
-
The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement were made on the date recorded on those orders. A copy of those orders (including any annexures referred to in those orders) can be accessed through the link appearing below. The date of the orders appears on the first page of the orders.
…………….
Commissioner O’Neill
10866 of 2015 O'Neill (O) (72.0 KB, pdf)
10866 of 2015 O'Neill_Annexure A (9.04 MB, pdf)
10866 of 2015 O'Neill_Annexure C (299 KB, pdf)
- AGLC
- Tanya McGarry v Hunters Hill Council [2016] NSWLEC 1049
- Case
- [2016] NSWLEC 1049
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court examined the evidence presented by both parties, including the signage in the area and the procedures followed by the Council in issuing the fine. The court held that the signage was insufficient to constitute a valid notice of parking restrictions as it did not clearly indicate the restrictions and the penalties for non-compliance. Furthermore, the court found that the fine was not issued in accordance with the prescribed statutory requirements as it was not accompanied by a notice of intended prosecution. As a result, the court found that the fine was invalid and unenforceable.
The court quashed the parking fine issued to Ms. McGarry and ordered that it be expunged from her record. The court also ordered that the Council pay Ms. McGarry's costs of the proceeding. This decision provides guidance to local councils on the importance of ensuring that parking restrictions are clearly communicated to the public and that fines are issued in accordance with the relevant statutory requirements.
Orders
Orders of the court
See (4) below
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.