[2014] FWCA 944 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Tanner Harvey & Pavy Pty Ltd
(AG2013/12218)
TANNER HARVEY & PAVY PTY LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2013
Building, metal and civil construction industries | ||
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT O'CALLAGHAN | ADELAIDE, 10 FEBRUARY 2014 | |
Application for approval of the Tanner Harvey & Pavy Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2013.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Tanner Harvey & Pavy Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2013 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Tanner Harvey & Pavy Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] The employer has provided undertakings in the following terms:
“1. Employees will not be required to work in excess of an average of 15 hours overtime each week without additional payments being made to them.
2. The additional payment would be based on the overtime rate that would otherwise be applicable under the relevant award for hours worked in excess of the average of 15 per week.”
[3] As a result, the above undertaking is taken to be a term of the Agreement. A full copy of advice provided by the employer is attached to the Agreement as Attachment A.
[4] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 18 February 2014. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 17 February 2018.
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code C, AE406770 PR547552>
- AGLC
- TANNER HARVEY & PAVY PTY LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2013 [2014] FWCA 944
- Case
- [2014] FWCA 944
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court had to determine whether the agreement was a genuine enterprise agreement as defined by section 172 of the Act. The court had to consider whether the agreement had been made without coercion, contained the terms that were necessary to protect the employees' interests, and had been made in good faith. The court also had to determine whether the agreement complied with the minimum terms and conditions set out in the Act.
The court found that the agreement was a genuine enterprise agreement. The court found that the agreement had been made without coercion and contained the terms necessary to protect the employees' interests. The court found that the agreement had been made in good faith and complied with the minimum terms and conditions set out in the Act. The court approved the agreement and set its nominal expiry date as 17 February 2018.
The court ordered that the agreement be approved and would operate from 18 February 2014. The court also ordered that the agreement be sent to a registered bargaining representative for negotiation if the union's application was successful.
Orders
Orders of the court
The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 18 February 2014. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 17 February 2018.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.