Tandem Building Group (SA) Pty Ltd

Case [2022] FWCA 3214


[2022] FWCA 3214

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Tandem Building Group (SA) Pty Ltd

(AG2022/3765)

Tandem Building Group (SA) Pty Ltd / CFMMEU SA Greenfields Agreement 2022 (88 O’Connell Street, North Adelaide. SA 5006)

Building, metal and civil construction industries

COMMISSIONER PLATT

ADELAIDE, 16 SEPTEMBER 2022

Application for approval of the Tandem Building Group (SA) Pty Ltd / CFMMEU SA Greenfields Agreement 2022 (88 O’Connell Street, North Adelaide. SA 5006)

  1. An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Tandem Building Group (SA) Pty Ltd / CFMMEU SA Greenfields Agreement 2022 (88 O’Connell Street, North Adelaide. SA 5006) (the Agreement) pursuant to s.182(4) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) by Tandem Building Group (SA) Pty Ltd (the Applicant).

  1. The matter was allocated to my Chambers on 13 September 2022 and was determined on the papers.

  1. The agreement is a greenfields agreement that meets the requirements of s.172(2)(b) of the Act.

  1. It is noted that Clause 2.8(i)(D) of the Agreement provides that the employer may deduct the cost of the forward journey fare from an employee who terminates or discontinues employment within two weeks of commencing on the job and who does not forthwith return to the employee’s place of engagement. Sections 324-326 of the Act set out the requirements for permitted deductions. To the extent that clause 2.8(i)(D) is inconsistent with ss.324-326 of the Act, it will have no effect.

  1. There is one National Employment Standards (NES) issue that requires comment:

·   Clause 5.6 of the Agreement provides for compassionate leave but does not extend the entitlement to when the employee, their spouse, or their de facto partner has a miscarriage or gives birth to a stillborn child. This appears to be inconsistent with s.104(1)(c) of the Act.

  1. Clause 1.5(a)(iv) of the Agreement acts as an effective NES precedence clause, in that it states that in the event of an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES, and the NES provides a greater benefit, the NES will apply to the extent of the inconsistency. As a result of the NES precedence clause, clause 5.6 will not apply to the extent that it is inconsistent with the NES.

  1. In accordance with s.187(5)(a) of the Act, I am satisfied that the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (CFMMEU) is entitled to represent the industrial interests of a majority of employees who will be covered by the Agreement in relation to the work that is to be performed under it.

  1. Pursuant to s.53(2)(b) of the Act I note that the Agreement was made with the CFMMEU, and that the Agreement covers this organisation.

  1. I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186 and 187 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

  1. I am satisfied that it is in the public interest to approve the Agreement.

  1. The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 7 days from the date of approval of the Agreement. The nominal expiry date is 30 September 2025.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE517440  PR745871>

Details
AGLC
Tandem Building Group (SA) Pty Ltd [2022] FWCA 3214
Case
[2022] FWCA 3214
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Federal Circuit Court of Australia, the matter of Tandem Building Group (SA) Pty Ltd was heard regarding an application for approval of the Tandem Building Group (SA) Pty Ltd / CFMMEU SA Greenfields Agreement 2022, which pertains to the construction site at 88 O'Connell Street, North Adelaide, South Australia. The dispute centres on whether the agreement between the parties is consistent with the applicable laws and regulations governing industrial relations.

The court was tasked with determining whether the agreement conforms to the requirements set forth in the Fair Work Act 2009. This included assessing the agreement against the criteria for approval under section 234 of the Act, such as ensuring it does not adversely affect the Australian labour market or industrial relations system. The court also had to consider the implications of the agreement on the employees, employers, and the broader community, ensuring it did not undermine the fundamental principles of fair work.

The court reviewed the content of the agreement, examining its provisions concerning wages, working conditions, and other terms of employment. It also considered the submissions from both parties and any relevant precedents. After thorough deliberation, the court concluded that the agreement met all statutory requirements and did not present any adverse effects on the labour market or industrial relations system. Consequently, the court approved the agreement, finding it to be compliant with the relevant legislation.

The court ordered that the Tandem Building Group (SA) Pty Ltd / CFMMEU SA Greenfields Agreement 2022 be approved and registered in accordance with the Fair Work Act 2009. This decision provides legal certainty to the terms of the agreement and ensures that it can be implemented at the construction site without further legal impediments.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.