Tait and Densmore (No. 2)

In *Tait and Densmore (No. 2)*, Justice Cronin of the Supreme Court of Victoria considered an application for costs made by the Independent Children’s Lawyer. The specific nature of the underlying dispute between the parties, Tait and Densmore, is not detailed in the provided text, nor is the context of the Independent Children’s Lawyer's involvement.

The central legal issue before the Court was whether to grant the application for costs brought by the Independent Children’s Lawyer. The Court was required to determine the merits of this application and decide whether to make an order for costs in favour of the Independent Children’s Lawyer.

Justice Cronin dismissed the application for costs. The reasoning behind this decision is not elaborated upon in the provided text, but the outcome indicates that the Court found no grounds to award costs to the Independent Children’s Lawyer in this instance.