Taber and Taber
Case
•
[2014] FCCA 11
•10 January 2014
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Taber and Taber [2014] FCCA 11
[2014] FCCA 11
10 January 2014
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the matter of *Taber and Taber*, Judge Jones considered an application to vary existing consent orders concerning the parenting arrangements for a child, [X], born in 2001. The original orders, made by consent on 22 December 2010, were sought to be discharged and replaced with new arrangements.
The court was required to determine the best interests of the child, [X], in light of the proposed changes to living arrangements, parental responsibility, and the father's time with the child. Specifically, the court had to consider the mother's application to relocate with the child to [L], Victoria, and to be granted sole parental responsibility for all major long-term issues concerning the child. The court also had to establish new communication and time arrangements between the father and the child, as well as address provisions for the child's health, education, and the parties' participation in therapy and counselling.
Judge Jones discharged specific paragraphs of the previous consent orders and made new orders reflecting a significant shift in the parenting arrangements. The child was ordered to live with the mother, who was permitted to relocate with the child to [L], Victoria. The mother was granted sole parental responsibility for all major long-term issues concerning the child. The father's time with the child was detailed, including specific arrangements for school terms and holidays, and liberal communication via electronic means was also ordered. Further orders mandated the parties to attend family therapy and individual counselling, and the Independent Children's Lawyer was discharged, save for costs. The court also included particulars of obligations and consequences of contravention pursuant to section 65DA(2) of the *Family Law Act 1975* (Cth).
The court was required to determine the best interests of the child, [X], in light of the proposed changes to living arrangements, parental responsibility, and the father's time with the child. Specifically, the court had to consider the mother's application to relocate with the child to [L], Victoria, and to be granted sole parental responsibility for all major long-term issues concerning the child. The court also had to establish new communication and time arrangements between the father and the child, as well as address provisions for the child's health, education, and the parties' participation in therapy and counselling.
Judge Jones discharged specific paragraphs of the previous consent orders and made new orders reflecting a significant shift in the parenting arrangements. The child was ordered to live with the mother, who was permitted to relocate with the child to [L], Victoria. The mother was granted sole parental responsibility for all major long-term issues concerning the child. The father's time with the child was detailed, including specific arrangements for school terms and holidays, and liberal communication via electronic means was also ordered. Further orders mandated the parties to attend family therapy and individual counselling, and the Independent Children's Lawyer was discharged, save for costs. The court also included particulars of obligations and consequences of contravention pursuant to section 65DA(2) of the *Family Law Act 1975* (Cth).
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
Legal Concepts
-
Consent
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Taber and Taber [2014] FCCA 11
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
9
Statutory Material Cited
3
Friscioni & Friscioni
[2010] FamCAFC 108
Hannigan & Sorraw
[2010] FamCAFC 257
Vigano & Latimer
[2010] FMCAfam 660