Tabart and Civil Aviation Safety Authority

Case

[2018] AATA 2830

24 May 2018


Details
AGLC Case Decision Date
Tabart and Civil Aviation Safety Authority [2018] AATA 2830 [2018] AATA 2830 24 May 2018

CaseChat Overview and Summary

This matter concerned an appeal by Mr Tabart against decisions made by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) regarding the issuance of a Class 2 medical certificate. The dispute centred on whether Mr Tabart met the legislative criteria for such a certificate, given a medical condition identified as relevant to aviation safety.

The Administrative Appeals Tribunal was required to determine whether Mr Tabart possessed a safety-relevant medical condition that precluded him from satisfying the legislative criteria for a Class 2 medical certificate. The Tribunal also had to consider whether, despite any such condition, a Class 2 medical certificate could be issued with a specific condition to ensure the safety of air navigation.

The Tribunal found that Mr Tabart did indeed have a safety-relevant medical condition. However, it concluded that the only condition that would adequately ensure the safety of air navigation was that Mr Tabart fly only with a safety pilot. Accordingly, the Tribunal affirmed CASA's decisions to issue Mr Tabart a Class 2 medical certificate with the condition that he fly only with a safety pilot, finding these decisions to be correct.
Details

Areas of Law

  • Administrative Law

  • Statutory Interpretation

Legal Concepts

  • Judicial Review

  • Procedural Fairness

  • Standing

  • Statutory Construction

  • Remedies

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

2

Statutory Material Cited

0

Boughey v the Queen [1986] HCA 29
Harriott & Arena [2016] FamCAFC 69
Boughey v the Queen [1986] HCA 29