| [2016] FWCA 6727 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
T & D Group Pty Ltd T/A Express Walls Australia
(AG2016/4311)
T & D GROUP PTY LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2016
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
COMMISSIONER LEE | MELBOURNE, 20 SEPTEMBER 2016 |
Application for approval of the T & D Group Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2016.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the T & D Group Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2016 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by T & D Group Pty Ltd T/A Express Walls Australia. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The application was not lodged within 14 days after the agreement was made. Pursuant to s.185(3)(b), in all the circumstances I consider it fair to extend the time for making the application to the date it was actually made.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 27 September 2016. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 19 September 2020.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE421196 PR585558>
- AGLC
- T & D Group Pty Ltd T/A Express Walls Australia [2016] FWCA 6727
- Case
- [2016] FWCA 6727
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In examining these issues, the Commission considered various submissions from both the applicant and the registered union representing the employees. The Commission assessed the negotiation process, the terms of the agreement, and whether the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment. The Commission also had to consider if the agreement adequately protected the rights of employees and whether it was consistent with the broader objectives of the Fair Work Act.
The Fair Work Commission ultimately found that the Enterprise Agreement 2016 met the necessary criteria for approval. The Commission was satisfied that the agreement was the product of good faith bargaining and that it provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment. The Commission also concluded that the agreement adequately protected the rights of employees and was consistent with the objectives of the Fair Work Act. Consequently, the application for approval was granted, and the Enterprise Agreement 2016 was approved as a registered agreement.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.