SZDLI v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs

Case [2005] FCA 532


FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

SZDLI v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs   [2005] FCA 532

MIGRATION – Application for extension of time to appeal – application dismissed.

SZDLI v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS

NSD 130 OF 2005

HILL J
18 APRIL 2005
SYDNEY


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY

NSD 130 OF 2005

BETWEEN:

SZDLI
APPLICANT

AND:

MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT

JUDGE:

HILL

DATE OF ORDER:

18 APRIL 2005

WHERE MADE:

SYDNEY

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

  1. The application for an extension of time to file and serve a notice of appeal be dismissed.
  2. The applicant pay the respondent’s costs of the application.

Note:    Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY

NSD 130 OF 2005

BETWEEN:

SZDLI
APPLICANT

AND:

MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT

JUDGE:

HILL

DATE:

18 APRIL 2005

PLACE:

SYDNEY

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
(Ex tempore – revised)

HILL J

  1. This is an application for an extension of time to file and serve a notice of appeal from a judgment given by a federal magistrate.  The application was filed pursuant to order 52, rule 15(5) of the Federal Court Rules.  As the applicant has not appeared, either at the time the matter was listed for hearing, or twenty minutes later, the application is dismissed and the applicant is to pay the respondent’s costs of the application.

I certify that the preceding numbered paragraph is a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Hill.

Associate:

Dated:             18 April 2005

For the Respondent:

There was no appearance by the applicant.

K Crawley

Date of Hearing: 18 April 2005
Date of Judgment: 18 April 2005
Details
AGLC
SZDLI v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 532
Case
[2005] FCA 532
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The matter before the court was an application by SZDLI, an applicant for a visa, against the Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs. SZDLI sought an extension of time to file and serve a notice of appeal against the Minister’s decision to refuse an application for a visa. The applicant contended that the extension was necessary due to the unavailability of the applicant’s lawyer, who was overseas, and the complexity of the case.

The central issue before the court was whether the applicant had provided sufficient grounds for the extension of time to file and serve a notice of appeal. The court needed to determine if the applicant's reasons for delay were exceptional and justified under the applicable legal principles. The court also had to consider whether the delay would cause any injustice to the respondent.

The court found that the applicant had not provided exceptional circumstances to warrant an extension of time. The applicant's reasons for delay were not deemed sufficient to justify the extension. The court held that the applicant had not demonstrated any significant prejudice that would result from the delay. Consequently, the court dismissed the application for an extension of time. The applicant was ordered to pay the respondent’s costs of the application.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. The application for an extension of time to file and serve a notice of appeal be dismissed.

2. The applicant pay the respondent’s costs of the application.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

HILL J

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Established by: HILL J

Full text does not contain this section.