[2013] FWCA 1413 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Symrise Pty Ltd
(AG2013/5156)
SYMRISE PTY LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT [2013]
Scientific services | |
COMMISSIONER ROBERTS | SYDNEY, 7 MARCH 2013 |
Application for approval of the Symrise Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement [2013].
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Symrise Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement [2013] (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) by Symrise Pty Ltd. The agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as is relevant to this application for approval has been met.
[3] In accordance with clause 5.4 (Dispute Resolution), the model consultation term is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
[4] In accordance with clause 5.5 (Individual Flexibility Arrangement), the model consultation term is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
[5] In accordance with clause 5.6 (Consultation), the model consultation term is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
[6] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 14 March 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 28 February 2015.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code C, AE400154 PR534581>
- AGLC
- Symrise Pty Ltd [2013] FWCA 1413
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 1413
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Commission included whether the agreement provided for the proper protection of employees' interests, whether it complied with the procedural requirements set out in the Act, and whether it provided adequate mechanisms for dispute resolution. The Commission had to examine the fairness and reasonableness of the agreement's terms, particularly in relation to minimum entitlements, pay rates, and working conditions. Additionally, the Commission needed to assess whether the agreement had been genuinely negotiated and whether it was appropriately certified by the Australian Bureau of Statistics.
In its decision, the Commission found that the agreement met the statutory requirements and was, therefore, appropriate for approval. The Commission was satisfied that the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms, considering the specific circumstances of the employees and the employer. It was noted that the agreement included provisions for minimum wages, leave entitlements, and other standard employment conditions. Furthermore, the Commission accepted that the agreement had been genuinely negotiated and certified in accordance with the Act. Consequently, the Commission approved the enterprise agreement, allowing it to come into effect as a legally binding contract between the parties.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.