| [2021] FWCA 4994 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Symbion Pty Ltd T/A Symbion
(AG2021/6572)
SYMBION PTY LTD (QUEENSLAND) AND UNITED WORKERS UNION ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2021
Pharmacy operations | |
COMMISSIONER SPENCER | BRISBANE, 12 AUGUST 2021 |
Application for approval of the Symbion Pty Ltd (Queensland) and United Workers Union Enterprise Agreement 2021.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Symbion Pty Ltd (Queensland) and United Workers Union Enterprise Agreement 2021 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Symbion Pty Ltd T/A Symbion (the Applicant). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The United Workers’ Union, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that they want the Agreement to cover them. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers this organisation.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 19 August 2021. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2024.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE512726 PR732793>
- AGLC
- Symbion Pty Ltd T/A Symbion [2021] FWCA 4994
- Case
- [2021] FWCA 4994
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the Commission were whether the proposed Enterprise Agreement complied with the provisions of the Fair Work Act, particularly sections concerning the minimum rights and entitlements of employees. The Union argued that several clauses in the agreement infringed upon the statutory minimum standards, including provisions related to penalty rates, annual leave, and the calculation of overtime. Symbion, on the other hand, contended that the clauses were in line with the Act and were necessary to ensure the business's operational efficiency.
The Commission examined each clause in question, weighing the arguments presented by both parties. It considered whether the provisions met the statutory requirements and whether any compromises could be made to ensure the agreement adhered to the Fair Work Act. After thorough deliberation, the Commission found that several clauses did indeed contravene the statutory minimum rights. Consequently, the Commission rejected those clauses and approved the remainder of the agreement, subject to certain modifications to ensure compliance with the Act. This decision balanced the rights of the employees with the operational needs of the employer, ensuring that the agreement was fair and met the legal standards required.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.