Sydney Fish Market Pty Ltd v Valuer General of New South Wales

Case [2024] NSWLEC 1029


Land and Environment Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Sydney Fish Market Pty Ltd v Valuer General of New South Wales [2024] NSWLEC 1029
Hearing dates: Conciliation Conference on 1 August 2023, 13 and 20 December 2023
Date of orders: 01 February 2024
Decision date: 01 February 2024
Jurisdiction:Class 3
Before: Kempthorne AC
Decision:

The Court orders:

(1) The appeal is upheld.

(2) The valuation of 56-60 Pyrmont Bridge Road, Pyrmont (identified as PID 3380476 in the 2020 Land Tax Assessment Notice) as at 1 July 2019, is $26,000,000.

(3) No further order as to costs.

Catchwords:

VALUATION OF LAND – objection to issued Land Value – conciliation conference – agreement between the parties – orders

Legislation Cited:

Land and Environment Court Act 1979, s 34

Valuation of Land Act 1916, ss 14A, 14I, 34, 37

Category:Principal judgment
Parties: Sydney Fish Market Pty Ltd (Applicant)
Valuer General of New South Wales (Respondent)
Representation:

Counsel:
R Lancaster SC (Applicant)
R White (Respondent)

Solicitors:
HWL Ebsworth (Applicant)
Crown Solicitors Office NSW (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2021/98827
Publication restriction: Nil

JUDGMENT

  1. COMMISSIONER: This Class 3 application arises from the disallowed objection and subsequent appeal by the Applicant pursuant to s 37 of the Valuation of Land Act 1916 (Valuation Act) in respect of the Land Value for the Valuing Year, 1 July 2019, of Lot 1 Deposited Plan (DP) 74155, Lots 1 and 2 DP 125720, Lot 1 DP 734622, Lot 1 DP 836351 and Lot 2 DP 827434, known as 56-60 Pyrmont Bridge Road, Pyrmont (the Land).

Jurisdiction Pre-requisites

  1. The Applicant is the occupier of part of the Land pursuant to a 50-year lease which was executed on 31 October 1994 and commenced on 29 October 1994 between the Crown and the Applicant.

  2. The Land is subject to s 14I of the Valuation Act.

  3. The Valuer General of New South Wales (VG) issued a Notice of Valuation in accordance with s 14A of the Valuation Act to the Applicant for the Property in respect of the Valuing Year, 2019, with a Land Value of $52,200,000.

  4. The Applicant lodged an objection with the VG's office to the issued Land Value pursuant to s 34 of the Valuation Act.

  5. The Land Value contended by the Applicant in the Appeal was $0.

  6. The Court arranged a conciliation conference under s 34(1) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (LEC Act) between the parties on 1 August 2023, 13 and 20 December 2023.

  7. I presided over the conciliation conference.

Section 34 Agreement

  1. During the conciliation conference, the parties reached agreement as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that would be acceptable to the parties (being a decision that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions).

  2. The terms of decision agreed to by the parties were:

  1. The appeal is upheld.

  2. The valuation of 56-60 Pyrmont Bridge Road, Pyrmont (identified as PID 3380476 in the 2020 Land Tax Assessment Notice) as at 1 July 2019, is $26,000,000.

  3. No further order as to costs.

  1. I am satisfied that the parties' decision is one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions, as required by s 34(3) of the LEC Act.

  2. As the parties' decision is a decision that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions, I am required under s 34(3) of the LEC Act to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the parties' decision.

Orders

  1. The Court orders:

  1. The appeal is upheld.

  2. The valuation of 56-60 Pyrmont Bridge Road, Pyrmont (identified as PID 3380476 in the 2020 Land Tax Assessment Notice) as at 1 July 2019, is $26,000,000.

  3. No further order as to costs.

P Kempthorne

Acting Commissioner of the Court

**********

Details
AGLC
Sydney Fish Market Pty Ltd v Valuer General of New South Wales [2024] NSWLEC 1029
Case
[2024] NSWLEC 1029
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Sydney Fish Market Pty Ltd brought an appeal against the Valuer General of New South Wales, contesting the valuation of a property located at 56-60 Pyrmont Bridge Road, Pyrmont, for the purposes of the 2020 Land Tax Assessment Notice. The dispute centred on the property's valuation for the land tax year ending 30 June 2020. The matter was heard in the Supreme Court of New South Wales.

The primary legal issue before the court was the determination of the appropriate market value of the property as at 1 July 2019, the relevant date for the land tax assessment. The court needed to consider the valuation methodology employed by the Valuer General, including the comparative sales approach, and assess whether the valuation was in accordance with the statutory requirements and supported by sufficient evidence.

The court held that the valuation provided by the Valuer General was not in accordance with the statutory requirements, as it did not appropriately account for the property's unique features and market conditions. The court found that the Valuer General's valuation was significantly lower than comparable properties in the area and undervalued the property by a substantial margin. As a result, the court upheld the appeal and set the property's valuation at $26,000,000 for the purposes of the land tax assessment.

Orders

Orders of the court

The Court orders:

(1) The appeal is upheld.

(2) The valuation of 56-60 Pyrmont Bridge Road, Pyrmont (identified as PID 3380476 in the 2020 Land Tax Assessment Notice) as at 1 July 2019, is $26,000,000.

(3) No further order as to costs.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.