Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Switaj v Wollongong City Council [2019] NSWLEC 1334 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 12 July 2019 Date of orders: 16 July 2019 Decision date: 16 July 2019 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Dickson C Decision: The Court orders:
(1) The Applicant is granted leave to rely on the following amended plans prepared by T & C Design Consultants:
(a) Drawing No. 00/11, dated 8 April 2019;
(b) Drawing No. 01/11, Revision 6, dated 8 April 2019;
(c) Drawing No. 1A/11, Revision 9, dated 8 April 2019;
(d) Drawing No. 1B/11, dated 8 April 2019;
(e) Drawing No. 1C/11, Revision 1, dated 23 February 2019;
(f) Drawing No. 1D/11, dated 2 April 2019;
(g) Drawing No. 02/11, Revision 8, dated 8 April 2019;
(h) Drawing No. 03/11, Revision 7, dated 8 April 2019;
(i) Drawing No. 04/11, Revision 7, dated 8 April 2019;
(j) Drawing No. 4A/11, Revision 5, dated 8 April 2019;
(k) Drawing No. 05/11, Revision 6, dated 8 April 2019;
(l) Drawing No. 06/11, Revision 4, dated 29 March 2019;
(m) Drawing No. 07/11, Revision 2, dated May 2018;
(n) Drawing No. 08/11, Revision 3, dated 8 April 2019;
(o) Drawing No. 09/11, Revision 1, dated February 2018;
(p) Drawing No. 10/11, dated November 2017; and
(q) Drawing No. 11/11, dated November 2017.
(2) The Applicant is granted leave to rely on the following amended stormwater plans prepared by Footprint Sustainable Engineering:
(a) Drawing No. 1714-C01, Revision 6, dated 10 April 2019;
(b) Drawing No. 1714-C02, Revision 6, dated 10 April 2019; and
(c) Drawing No. 1714-C03, Revision 6, dated 10 April 2019.
(3) The appeal is upheld.
(4) DA-2017/1719 for the construction of a residential dwelling house and two swimming pools and spa at 1A Norman Street, Mangerton NSW 2500 is determined by the grant of development consent, subject to the conditions at Annexure A.Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION – Residential dwelling – amended design – conciliation conference – agreement between the parties – orders Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
Land and Environment Court Act 1979
State Environmental Planning Policy (Building Sustainability Index: BASIX) 2004
Wollongong Local Environmental Plan 2009Category: Principal judgment Parties: Ted Michael Switaj (Applicant)
Wollongong City Council (Respondent)Representation: Solicitors:
C Ters, Hones Lawyers (Applicant)
J Reilly, Wollongong City Council (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2018/359246 Publication restriction: No
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: This is an appeal pursuant to s 8.7(1) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (the EPA Act) by the Applicant against the actual refusal of its development application DA-2017/1719. The application seeks approval for a two storey dwelling house, a lap pool, swimming pool, spa and retaining walls. The development is proposed at 1A Norman Street, Mangerton (Lot 1 DP 617042).
-
In exercising the functions of the consent authority on the appeal, the Court has the power to determine the development application pursuant to ss 4.15 and 4.16 of the EPA Act.
-
The Court arranged a conciliation conference under s 34(1) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the LEC Act) between the parties, which was held on 12 July 2019. Following the conciliation, an agreement under s 34(3) of the LEC Act was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that would be acceptable to them. The decision agreed upon is to uphold the appeal and to grant development consent subject to conditions of consent, pursuant to s 4.16(1) of the EPA Act.
-
As the presiding Commissioner, I am satisfied that the decision is one that the Court can make in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the LEC Act). I have formed this state of satisfaction for the following reasons:
The subject land is bushfire prone land and is integrated development under s 4.46 of the EPA Act. It was referred to the NSW Rural Fire Services who provided a Bushfire Safety Authority and concurrence conditions which are incorporated in the attached conditions.
Pursuant to Wollongong Local Environmental Plan 2009, the subject site is zoned R2 Low Density Residential. The proposed development is permissible with consent in the zone.
In compliance with State Environmental Planning Policy (Building Sustainability Index: BASIX) 2004, a BASIX certificate has been lodged (BASIX Certificate 885349S).
The original and amended applications were notified in accordance with the relevant development control plan and the submissions have been considered.
-
As the parties’ decision is a decision that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions, I am required under s 34(3) of the LEC Act to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the parties’ decision.
-
In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, the parties have not raised and I am not aware of any jurisdictional impediment to the making of these orders. Further, I was not required to make, and have not made, any assessment of the merits of the development application against the discretionary matters that arise pursuant to an assessment under s 4.15 of the EPA Act.
-
The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s 34(3) of the Court Act are:
The Applicant is granted leave to rely on the following amended plans prepared by T & C Design Consultants:
Drawing No. 00/11, dated 8 April 2019;
Drawing No. 01/11, Revision 6, dated 8 April 2019;
Drawing No. 1A/11, Revision 9, dated 8 April 2019;
Drawing No. 1B/11, dated 8 April 2019;
Drawing No. 1C/11, Revision 1, dated 23 February 2019;
Drawing No. 1D/11, dated 2 April 2019;
Drawing No. 02/11, Revision 8, dated 8 April 2019;
Drawing No. 03/11, Revision 7, dated 8 April 2019;
Drawing No. 04/11, Revision 7, dated 8 April 2019;
Drawing No. 4A/11, Revision 5, dated 8 April 2019;
Drawing No. 05/11, Revision 6, dated 8 April 2019;
Drawing No. 06/11, Revision 4, dated 29 March 2019;
Drawing No. 07/11, Revision 2, dated May 2018;
Drawing No. 08/11, Revision 3, dated 8 April 2019;
Drawing No. 09/11, Revision 1, dated February 2018;
Drawing No. 10/11, dated November 2017; and
Drawing No. 11/11, dated November 2017.
The Applicant is granted leave to rely on the following amended stormwater plans prepared by Footprint Sustainable Engineering:
Drawing No. 1714-C01, Revision 6, dated 10 April 2019;
Drawing No. 1714-C02, Revision 6, dated 10 April 2019; and
Drawing No. 1714-C03, Revision 6, dated 10 April 2019.
The appeal is upheld.
DA-2017/1719 for the construction of a residential dwelling house and two swimming pools and spa at 1A Norman Street, Mangerton NSW 2500 is determined by the grant of development consent, subject to the conditions at Annexure A.
……………………………
D M Dickson
Commissioner of the Court
Annexure A (220 KB, pdf)
**********
- AGLC
- Switaj v Wollongong City Council [2019] NSWLEC 1334
- Case
- [2019] NSWLEC 1334
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the Court was whether the applicant was entitled to rely on the amended plans and stormwater plans in support of the development application. The Court had to consider the requirements of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 and relevant policies and guidelines. The Court also had to determine whether the amended plans and stormwater plans complied with the relevant legislative and policy framework.
The Court found that the applicant was entitled to rely on the amended plans and stormwater plans, as they addressed the issues raised in the Council’s earlier objections and complied with the relevant legislative and policy requirements. The Court held that the amended plans and stormwater plans provided sufficient detail and information to assess the application and that the development consent should be granted subject to certain conditions. The Court noted that the development would not have a significant impact on the environment or neighbouring properties.
The Court allowed the appeal and granted development consent for the construction of a residential dwelling house and two swimming pools and spa at the specified address, subject to the conditions set out in Annexure A. The Court also granted leave to the applicant to rely on the amended plans and stormwater plans in support of the development application.
Orders
Orders of the court
The Court orders:
(1) The Applicant is granted leave to rely on the following amended plans prepared by T & C Design Consultants:
(a) Drawing No. 00/11, dated 8 April 2019;
(b) Drawing No. 01/11, Revision 6, dated 8 April 2019;
(c) Drawing No. 1A/11, Revision 9, dated 8 April 2019;
(d) Drawing No. 1B/11, dated 8 April 2019;
(e) Drawing No. 1C/11, Revision 1, dated 23 February 2019;
(f) Drawing No. 1D/11, dated 2 April 2019;
(g) Drawing No. 02/11, Revision 8, dated 8 April 2019;
(h) Drawing No. 03/11, Revision 7, dated 8 April 2019;
(i) Drawing No. 04/11, Revision 7, dated 8 April 2019;
(j) Drawing No. 4A/11, Revision 5, dated 8 April 2019;
(k) Drawing No. 05/11, Revision 6, dated 8 April 2019;
(l) Drawing No. 06/11, Revision 4, dated 29 March 2019;
(m) Drawing No. 07/11, Revision 2, dated May 2018;
(n) Drawing No. 08/11, Revision 3, dated 8 April 2019;
(o) Drawing No. 09/11, Revision 1, dated February 2018;
(p) Drawing No. 10/11, dated November 2017; and
(q) Drawing No. 11/11, dated November 2017.
(2) The Applicant is granted leave to rely on the following amended stormwater plans prepared by Footprint Sustainable Engineering:
(a) Drawing No. 1714-C01, Revision 6, dated 10 April 2019;
(b) Drawing No. 1714-C02, Revision 6, dated 10 April 2019; and
(c) Drawing No. 1714-C03, Revision 6, dated 10 April 2019.
(3) The appeal is upheld.
(4) DA-2017/1719 for the construction of a residential dwelling house and two swimming pools and spa at 1A Norman Street, Mangerton NSW 2500 is determined by the grant of development consent, subject to the conditions at Annexure A.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.