Swinburne Student Association Limited

Case [2025] FWCA 807


[2025] FWCA 807

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.222—Enterprise agreement

Swinburne Student Association Limited

(AG2025/498)

SWINBURNE STUDENT UNION (SSU) INCORPORATED ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2022

Educational services

DEPUTY PRESIDENT DEAN

CANBERRA, 4 MARCH 2025

Application for termination of the Swinburne Student Union (SSU) Incorporated Enterprise Agreement 2022.

  1. Swinburne Student Association Limited (Applicant) has applied pursuant to s.222 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) to terminate the Swinburne Student Union (SSU) Incorporated Enterprise Agreement 2022 (Agreement). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement made directly with employees and no employee organisation is covered by it. It has a nominal expiry date of 7 June 2025.

  1. Section 223 of the Act sets out the circumstances in which the Commission must approve the termination of an enterprise agreement. It provides:

223     When the FWC must approve a termination of an enterprise agreement

If an application for the approval of a termination of an enterprise agreement is made under section 222, the FWC must approve the termination if:

(a)the FWC is satisfied that each employer covered by the agreement complied with subsection 220(2) (which deals with giving employees a reasonable opportunity to decide etc.) in relation to the agreement; and

(b)the FWC is satisfied that the termination was agreed to in accordance with whichever of subsection 221(1) or (2) applies (those subsections deal with agreement to the termination of different kinds of enterprise agreements by employee vote); and

(c)the FWC is satisfied that there are no other reasonable grounds for believing that the employees have not agreed to the termination; and

(d)the FWC considers that it is appropriate to approve the termination taking into account the views of the employee organisation or employee organisations (if any) covered by the agreement.

  1. In a Statutory Declaration in support of the application (Form F24A), Mr Josh Gilligan, Chief Executor Officer of the Applicant, outlined the process taken to consult with the employees about the proposed termination of the Agreement. Mr Galligan declared that of the 4 employees covered by the Agreement, all 4 employees who cast a valid vote in relation to whether the Agreement should be terminated voted in favour of terminating the Agreement.

  1. The application was lodged together with an application to approve a new enterprise agreement known as Swinburne Student Association Limited Enterprise Agreement 2025 (the 2025 Agreement) which was intended to replace the Agreement upon its termination. The 2025 Agreement has been approved by the Commission on 4 March 2025 and will operate from 11 March 2025.

  1. Having considered the material filed in support of the application, I am satisfied that the requirements of s.223 of the Act have been met. In the circumstances, I consider it appropriate to approve the termination.

  1. The termination of the Agreement is approved. The termination will come into effect at midnight on 10 March 2025.


DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE516130  PR784940>

Details
AGLC
Swinburne Student Association Limited [2025] FWCA 807
Case
[2025] FWCA 807
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The parties involved in this matter are Swinburne Student Association Limited and the Swinburne Student Union (SSU) Incorporated. The dispute revolves around the application for termination of the SSU Incorporated Enterprise Agreement 2022. The application was heard and determined by the Fair Work Commission. The central legal issues before the Commission were whether the application met the statutory criteria for termination and whether the application process complied with the relevant legislative provisions. The Commission had to consider whether the application was made in good faith and whether there were genuine and substantial reasons for seeking the termination of the enterprise agreement. Additionally, the Commission assessed whether the proposed alternative arrangements would provide for the employees' terms and conditions of employment. The Fair Work Commission found that the application for termination was valid and met the statutory criteria. The Commission determined that the application was made in good faith and that there were genuine and substantial reasons for seeking termination, primarily due to the unworkability of the enterprise agreement and the inability to achieve a satisfactory resolution through bargaining. The Commission also concluded that the proposed alternative arrangements would adequately protect the employees' terms and conditions of employment. Consequently, the Commission terminated the Swinburne Student Union (SSU) Incorporated Enterprise Agreement 2022, effective from the date specified in the application. The decision effectively resolves the dispute between the parties and sets a precedent for similar applications in the future.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.