Sutcliffe and Watkins

In the matter of *Sutcliffe and Watkins*, heard before Cronin J, the proceedings concerned an application filed on 6 January 2016. The specific nature of the dispute between the parties, Ms Sutcliffe and Ms Watkins, is not detailed, but the orders indicate a complex legal matter involving a case guardian and proposed minutes of order.

The court was required to determine several issues, including the appointment of a case guardian for Ms Sutcliffe, the approval and sealing of proposed orders by consent, and the disposition of the application filed in January 2016. Additionally, the court needed to address the adjournment of outstanding applications for final relief.

Cronin J made several orders. Firstly, Ms Ridley was appointed as the case guardian for Ms Sutcliffe. Secondly, by consent, orders were made in accordance with minutes of proposed orders, which were marked as Exhibit "A", sealed, and attached to the court file. The solicitor for the applicant was directed to engross these minutes and deliver them electronically to the Associate within seven days. The application filed on 6 January 2016 was dismissed. Finally, all outstanding applications for final relief were adjourned to the Registrar for directions on 4 March 2016.