Susan Lloyd v State of Queensland (Department of Communities, Child Safety and Disability Services)
Case
•
[2015] QIRC 138
•30 July 2015
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Susan Lloyd v State of Queensland (Department of Communities, Child Safety and Disability Services) [2015] QIRC 138
[2015] QIRC 138
30 July 2015
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The case of Susan Lloyd v State of Queensland (Department of Communities, Child Safety and Disability Services) involved an application by Susan Lloyd for reinstatement after her dismissal from the Department of Communities, Child Safety and Disability Services. Lloyd was dismissed due to allegations of inappropriate conduct and breaches of policy and legislation related to her handling of a child protection case. The key issues before the court were whether Lloyd had adequately responded to the child's disclosures, acted inappropriately during interactions, and breached policies and procedures by pursuing warrants for the apprehension of the child. The court found that Lloyd had failed to appropriately respond to the child's disclosures, acted in a manner that obstructed the child's exit from a meeting, and yelled at the child's mother. Furthermore, Lloyd had breached policies and procedures by applying for warrants without sufficient justification, particularly disregarding the child's self-placement decision.
The court concluded that Lloyd's dismissal was not harsh, unjust, or unreasonable, and thus not unfair. It found that Lloyd's actions, including her disregard for the child's disclosures, her inappropriate conduct during interactions, and her misuse of warrants, constituted a serious breach of trust and a gross error of judgment. Given her position of seniority and trust within the department, her conduct warranted the loss of confidence by her employer. Consequently, the application for reinstatement was dismissed.
The court concluded that Lloyd's dismissal was not harsh, unjust, or unreasonable, and thus not unfair. It found that Lloyd's actions, including her disregard for the child's disclosures, her inappropriate conduct during interactions, and her misuse of warrants, constituted a serious breach of trust and a gross error of judgment. Given her position of seniority and trust within the department, her conduct warranted the loss of confidence by her employer. Consequently, the application for reinstatement was dismissed.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Employment & Labour Law
Legal Concepts
-
Unfair Dismissal
-
Code of Conduct
-
Breach of Policy
-
Child Protection
-
Appropriate Response to Allegations
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Kellaway v State of Queensland (Department of Transport and Main Roads) [2025] QIRC 175
Cases Citing This Decision
126
Cases Cited
1
Statutory Material Cited
0
Koehler v Cerebos (Australia) Ltd
[2005] HCA 15
Koehler v Cerebos (Australia) Ltd
[2005] HCA 15