SURRY & SURRY

Case

[2019] FamCA 661

18 September 2019


Details
AGLC Case Decision Date
SURRY & SURRY [2019] FamCA 661 [2019] FamCA 661 18 September 2019

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In this family law matter before Baumann J, the court was required to determine parenting and property arrangements for the parties. The primary dispute concerned the children's living arrangements and parental responsibility, with the court assessing the risk of harm presented by each parent. A secondary issue involved the division of the parties' modest divisible pool of property.

The court was tasked with determining whether the father presented an unacceptable risk of harm to the children and, conversely, whether the mother did. Following this assessment, the court needed to make orders regarding the children's residence, parental responsibility, and the nature and extent of their time with each parent. Additionally, the court was required to make property adjustment orders, with further submissions anticipated regarding the sale of the family home.

Baumann J found that the father did not present an unacceptable risk of harm to the children. However, the court determined that the mother did present an unacceptable risk of harm. Consequently, orders were made for the children to live with the father and for the father to have sole parental responsibility for major long-term issues. The court also issued injunctions restraining the mother from contacting the children at school or public activities and from removing them from their schools or the father's care. The father was directed to arrange for the children's ongoing counselling. In relation to property, the court indicated that orders would be made to achieve justice and equity, requiring the husband to file a minute of order for property adjustment within fourteen days.
Details

Areas of Law

  • Family Law

  • Equity & Trusts

Legal Concepts

  • Injunction

  • Remedies

  • Costs

  • Procedural Fairness

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

4

Statutory Material Cited

1

Surry and Surry [2018] FamCA 948
Stott & Holgar [2017] FamCAFC 152
M v M [1988] HCA 68