Suresh Bhalla v Woolworths Group Limited, Sarina Thomas

Case [2023] FWC 324


PR749396
ORDER

Fair Work Act 2009

s.789FC - Application for an order to stop bullying

Suresh Bhalla

v

Woolworths Group Limited, Sarina Thomas and another

(SO2022/219)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT O’NEILL

MELBOURNE, 4 JANUARY 2023

Application for an FWC order to stop bullying

  1. Further to my decision issued in this matter on 4 January 2023,[1] I order pursuant to s.587(1)(c) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) that Ms Suresh Bhalla’s application for an order to stop bullying made under s.789FC of the Act be dismissed.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer


Details
AGLC
Suresh Bhalla v Woolworths Group Limited, Sarina Thomas [2023] FWC 324
Case
[2023] FWC 324
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the case of Suresh Bhalla v Woolworths Group Limited, Sarina Thomas, the applicant, Suresh Bhalla, sought an order under the Fair Work Act 2009 to stop alleged bullying by his employer, Woolworths Group Limited, and two other respondents, Sarina Thomas and another. The matter was brought before the Fair Work Commission, and the Deputy President O'Neill delivered the decision on 4 January 2023. The applicant claimed that he had been subjected to bullying and harassment by his employer and colleagues, which had a detrimental effect on his health and wellbeing.

The primary legal issue before the court was whether the applicant had provided sufficient evidence to establish that the conduct complained of amounted to bullying or harassment within the meaning of the Fair Work Act. Additionally, the court needed to determine if the application met the threshold requirements for an order to be made under section 789FC of the Act. The court considered the evidence presented by both parties and assessed whether the alleged conduct was reasonable management action or constituted bullying or harassment.

After carefully examining the evidence and arguments presented, the Deputy President concluded that the applicant had not provided sufficient evidence to establish that the alleged conduct amounted to bullying or harassment within the meaning of the Fair Work Act. The court found that the applicant had not demonstrated that the conduct was unreasonable and had a reasonable basis. Consequently, the application for an order to stop bullying was dismissed.

As a result of the court's decision, the application for an order to stop bullying was dismissed, and no further action can be taken under section 789FC of the Fair Work Act. The court did not grant the relief sought by the applicant and found that the evidence presented was not sufficient to establish the alleged bullying and harassment.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.