Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists Monday, 14 January 2013 Summary

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS MONDAY, 14 JANUARY 2013

HOBART

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice EVANS
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Mention via video link
from Launceston Magistrates Court

Mark Leonard Thomas

For Further Directions Hearing
Christopher David Benjamine Wilton

For Application
Zane Michael Jamieson

For Committal for Sentence
Michael John Cowie

For Bail Consent
Jose Vasquez-Amay

In Court as in Chambers
For Bail Application
Christopher John Brown

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Magistrates Court, Charles, Launceston

Before Justice Evans by video-link
from Supreme Court, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Criminal Jurisdiction
In Court
10.00am For Mention

Mark Leonard Thomas

BURNIE
No list for Burnie until further notice.

_______________________________________________________

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania, sitting in Hobart, dealt with a variety of criminal matters in a session presided over by Justice Evans. One notable case was that of Mark Leonard Thomas, which was subject to a mention via video link from the Launceston Magistrates Court. The nature of the dispute in this case was not detailed in the provided excerpt, but it is clear that the court was considering procedural aspects related to Thomas's case. Another significant case was that of Christopher David Benjamine Wilton, which was scheduled for a further directions hearing. This suggests that the case was at a stage where the court needed to clarify the next steps in the proceedings. Additionally, the court handled an application by Zane Michael Jamieson, though the specifics of this application were not outlined.

The legal issues before the court involved determining the appropriate procedural steps for each case. In the case of Mark Leonard Thomas, the court was likely addressing whether the case should proceed to trial or if there were other immediate matters that needed resolution. For Christopher David Benjamine Wilton, the court needed to outline the next steps in the proceedings, which could include setting trial dates or addressing any outstanding issues. Zane Michael Jamieson's application required the court to consider the merits and legality of the application, determining whether it should be granted or dismissed.

Justice Evans, presiding over the session via video link from Hobart, provided rulings on each of these cases. The specific outcomes were not detailed, but it is evident that the court made decisions regarding the procedural aspects of each case. These decisions likely included directions for the Launceston Magistrates Court to follow or specific orders related to the applications and further directions hearings. The court's focus was on ensuring that the cases progressed appropriately within the legal framework.

No final orders were explicitly stated in the provided excerpt, but it is likely that the court issued directions and orders in line with its decisions on the procedural matters presented. The outcomes would have been communicated to the relevant parties and the Launceston Magistrates Court to ensure compliance with the court's directives.

Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists Monday, 14 January 2013

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established