Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 8 October 2014

Case [2014] TASSCCourtlist 208


SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR WEDNESDAY, 8 OCTOBER 2014

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Directions Hearing
Tony John Pettit

For Decision
Shayden James Cowen

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:15 p.m.
For Hearing
William Eric Yabsley
v
The Queen

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
In Court as In Chambers
For Application to Vary Bail
Garry Maxwell Billinghurst

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Discharge by video link to Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Peter Andrew Healey

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
Directions Hearing
Bulk Frozen Foods Pty Ltd
v
Kim Excell

LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Discharge by video-link Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston from Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Peter Andrew Healey

BURNIE
No list for Burnie
______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 8 October 2014 [2014] TASSCCourtlist 208
Case
[2014] TASSCCourtlist 208
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

This case involves a hearing before the Supreme Court of Tasmania, presided over by Justice Tennent. The matter pertains to Tony John Pettit, who is seeking directions. Another case involves William Eric Yabsley, who is defending a charge against The Queen. In yet another case, Garry Maxwell Billinghurst is seeking a variation to his bail conditions. The court also scheduled a civil matter involving Bulk Frozen Foods Pty Ltd and Kim Excell.

The legal issues in these cases revolve around the directions and decisions required for each case, including bail variations and discharges by video link. For the civil matter, the court is likely to focus on the directions required for the proceedings. The court must consider the legal principles and precedents applicable to each case, as well as the specific facts and arguments presented.

The court's reasoning and outcome will depend on the specific details of each case. For the directions hearing, Justice Tennent will likely provide guidance on the next steps in the proceedings. In the case of bail variation, Justice Pearce will consider the arguments and evidence presented by both parties and decide whether the bail conditions should be altered. The discharge by video link will require the court to ensure that the accused can participate effectively in the proceedings from a remote location. For the civil case, Justice Pearce will likely provide directions on the management and progression of the litigation.

The final orders will vary based on the outcomes of the hearings. For the directions hearing, the court may schedule further court appearances or set specific tasks for the parties. In the case of bail variation, the court will either approve or deny the application. For the discharge by video link, the court will confirm the arrangements for the accused's participation. For the civil case, the court may issue directions for disclosure, setting trial dates, or other procedural matters.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.