SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR WEDNESDAY, 7 AUGUST 2013
HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Fabian James Ackerley Trueman
Ben James Cleary
Stuart Malcolm Allen
Gary Robert Greig
Robert George Greig
For Trial
PML
(Part-Heard)
4:00 p.m.
For Sentence
Roderick Leigh Triffett
Phillip John Moran
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Mathew Shane Hugo
(Part-Heard)
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
In Court as in Chambers
9.45 a.m.
For Bail Application
Dwight Stanley Murtagh
Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Civil Jurisdiction
2.15 p.m.
For Decision
Ronald Krulow and Anor
v
Glamorgan Spring Bay Council
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
Costs/Extend Time Application/Set Aside Subpoena
New Bounty Pty Ltd & Anor
v
Winpar Holdings Ltd & Ors
4.00 p.m.
Directions Hearing by telephone
Tacey & Anor
v
Tacey
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice Estcourt
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00am For Trial (Part-Heard)
Jason Robert Burns
BJM
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice Pearce
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m. For Preliminary Proceedings Application via Video-Link
JWB
For Trial
Shane Robert Smith
(Part-Heard)
______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 7 August 2013 [2013] TASSCCourtlist 148
- Case
- [2013] TASSCCourtlist 148
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues in these cases ranged from the continuation and completion of trials to the granting of bail and the resolution of various civil disputes. The court had to ensure that the legal procedures were followed correctly and that justice was served in each case. This included verifying the evidence presented, ensuring the rights of the accused were protected, and making decisions that adhered to the law. The outcomes of these cases were pivotal for the parties involved, impacting their legal standing and future proceedings.
The reasoning and outcomes of the cases would have been based on the evidence presented and the applicable laws. The court's decisions would have been informed by legal precedents, statutes, and the specific circumstances of each case. The final orders would have been communicated to the parties involved, outlining the court's decisions and any subsequent actions required.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.