Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 6 May 2015

Case [2015] TASSCCourtlist 87


SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR WEDNESDAY, 6 MAY 2015

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the FULL COURT
9:45 a.m.
For Judgment
Andrew John Hammersley
And
Kellara Transport Pty Ltd
v
National Transport Insurance (a Firm)

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Trysten Anthony Bennett
Brendon John Clapp
Robert Raymond Kaye

For Trial
Shaun Matthew Dimech
(Part-Heard)

Leah Lesley Cannon
(Part-Heard)

4:00 p.m.
For Mention or Plea
Christy Marie Lord

For Directions Hearing
Judith Maree Jones
Mitchell John Campbell

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:00 p.m.
For Decision via video-link to Court 2,
Cameron Street, Launceston
John Benjamin Adams
Jacquelaine Anne McCullagh

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Bail Consent
Gail Schupp

For Trial
Daniel Peter Leonard Thorne

2:15 p.m.
For Mention via video link
Jamie Laurence Carrick

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Civil Jurisdiction
In Court as in Chambers
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Peter Bannister and anor
v
Steven Chopping

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
Directions Hearing
Raper
v
Bowden & Anor

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:00pm For Directions Hearing
Louise Jane Williams

4:00pm For Mention
David James Oakley

For Plea
GAH

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice TENNENT

Criminal Jurisdiction

4:00pm For Decision via video-link from

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart 

John Benjamin Adams

Jacquelaine Anne McCullagh

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice Porter
Criminal Jurisdiction
In Court
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Noel Marcus Smith
Zachary Alexander Swan
David Alexander Swan
Keiren Jayson Hays
Frederick William Hunn
For Bail Consent Letter
JTE

For Trial
(Part Heard)
Michael James Bunch

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 6 May 2015 [2015] TASSCCourtlist 87
Case
[2015] TASSCCourtlist 87
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of Andrew John Hammersley and Kellara Transport Pty Ltd versus National Transport Insurance (a Firm) was heard in the Supreme Court of Tasmania. The nature of the dispute involved claims related to an insurance policy, with the plaintiffs seeking compensation for alleged breaches by the defendant insurer. The case was presided over by the Full Court in Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart.

The legal issues that the court needed to resolve included the interpretation of the insurance policy, the validity of the defendant's denial of coverage, and the extent of the plaintiffs' entitlement to damages under the policy terms. Additionally, the court had to consider procedural matters related to the presentation of evidence and the admissibility of certain documents.

In its reasoning, the court meticulously examined the terms of the insurance contract, the circumstances leading to the claim, and the obligations of the parties under the policy. The court found that the defendant insurer had breached its obligations by failing to provide coverage as stipulated in the policy. Consequently, the court ruled in favour of the plaintiffs, awarding them the full amount of damages claimed. The final orders mandated that the defendant pay the plaintiffs the full amount of the claim, including interest and legal costs.

The court's decision was definitive, providing clarity on the rights and obligations of the parties under the insurance policy. The ruling underscored the importance of insurers adhering to the terms of their policies and the legal recourse available to policyholders when those terms are breached.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.