SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR WEDNESDAY, 6 FEBRUARY 2013
HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
9.30 a.m.
For Trial
Matthew John Townsend
(Part-Heard)
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Trial
Shane Rodney Narracott
(Part Heard)
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Chris Gurney
v
Daniel Jason Murphy
Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Civil Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Trial
Matthew Ody
v
Claire Andrews
(Part-Heard)
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
Strike Out Application
Quarmby
v
Harper
Quarmby
v
Oakley
2.00 p.m.
Discovery/List for Trial
Allison
v
Tuna Tasmania Pty Ltd & Ors
4.00 p.m.
Directions Hearing by telephone
Thompson
v
The State of Tasmania
4.15 p.m.
Pre-Trial Conference by telephone
Cruse
v
Aurora Energy Pty Ltd
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Chief Justice Crawford
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00am For Trial (Part-Heard)
Mark Leonard Thomas
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street Burnie before Justice Evans
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00am
For Trial
Justin James Browne
_______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 6 February 2013 [2013] TASSCCourtlist 10
- Case
- [2013] TASSCCourtlist 10
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues to be determined in these cases likely encompassed a range of civil and criminal matters, including the validity of contracts, personal injury claims, and criminal charges such as assault or theft. The outcomes would depend on the evidence presented, applicable laws, and judicial interpretation of the facts. The court's decisions would provide legal clarity and resolution for the parties involved, setting precedents that might influence future cases of a similar nature.
The reasoning and outcome of each case were not detailed in the law list. However, the scheduled hearings indicated that the court was set to address substantive legal issues, deliver judgments, and potentially make orders or provide directions as appropriate. The court's decisions would be communicated to the parties involved, and any appeals would follow the prescribed legal procedures.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.