SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR WEDNESDAY, 5 AUGUST 2015
HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Jamie Reginald Hall
BLH
4:00 p.m.
For Application
Kevin Lawrence Davenport
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention via Video-Link to Risdon Prison Complex
Robert Raymond Kaye
For Bail Consent
Raymond Terrence Brooks
For Trial
Dean Phillip Braslin
(Part-Heard)
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Legal Argument
Katherine Anne Hall
Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Darryl Robert Howlin
v
Resource Management & Planning Appeal Tribunal
(Part-Heard)
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
Dismiss Action
Duncan McPherson
v
Director of Housing & Ors
11:00 a.m.
For Submissions
Peter BLuett & Ors
v
Stanley Fletcher
4:00 p.m.
Directions Hearing by Telephone
Corestaff Group Holdings
v
Collins Contracting (Tas) Pty Ltd & Anor
4:15 p.m.
Directions Hearing by Telephone
Sharyn Connelly
v
Vizon Pty Ltd t/a Legudi Scarce Unit Trust & Ors
4:30 p.m.
Directions Hearing by Telephone
Brian Silva & Peter Krejci in their capacity as joint and
several administrators of FEA Plantations Ltd (receivers appointed)
& Forest Enterprises Australia Ltd (receivers and managers appointed)
v
Thomas Curtain in his capacity as trustee for the Banyan Superannuation Fund
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:00pm For Plea
Todd Martin Followes
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice Pearce
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 am for Trial (Part-Heard)
Mark Raymond Roland
______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 5 August 2015 [2015] TASSCCourtlist 162
- Case
- [2015] TASSCCourtlist 162
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues that arose in these cases varied widely, reflecting the broad scope of the Court’s jurisdiction. For the criminal cases, issues included the admissibility of evidence, the appropriateness of bail conditions, and the validity of charges brought against the defendants. In the civil matter, the primary issue was the correctness of a decision made by the Resource Management and Planning Appeal Tribunal. The Court had to determine whether the tribunal had acted within its powers and whether its decision was legally sound.
The Court’s reasoning and outcome in each case were tailored to the specific issues presented. For instance, in the criminal cases, Justices Tennant and Wood considered the principles of criminal law and procedure, ensuring that the rights of the accused were protected while also upholding the rule of law. In the civil case, Justice Porter examined the statutory framework governing the tribunal's decision-making process, as well as the evidence presented by the parties. The Court rendered decisions based on the legal arguments and evidence presented, ensuring that justice was served in accordance with the law.
The final orders varied according to the nature of each case. In the criminal matters, the Court made rulings on bail, scheduled further hearings, and set dates for trials. In the civil case, the Court provided directions on the proceedings, potentially setting the stage for a full hearing or a final determination on the tribunal's decision. The outcomes were aimed at ensuring that the legal process was followed correctly and that the rights of all parties were respected.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.