SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR WEDNESDAY, 4 NOVEMBER 2015
HOBART
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
4.15 p.m.
For Judgment
The Acting Director of Public Prosecutions
v
Derek Michael Crosswell, Jay John Bradford and David Ian Charles Coles
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Samuel Alfred Watterson
(Part-Heard)
4:00 p.m.
In Court as in Chambers
For Bail Application
Samuel David William Maple
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
9.30 a.m.
For Trial
Matthew James Linton
(Part Heard)
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Civil Jurisdiction
In Court as in Chambers
10:00 a.m.
For Interlocutory Application by video link from Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Property Consultants Counsel Pty Ltd
v
Mowbray Golf Club Inc
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Trial
John Benjamin Adams
4:15pm For Sentence
Bryce Anderson Woodward
Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Civil Jurisdiction
In Court as in Chambers
10:00am For Interlocutory Application by video link to Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Property Consultants Counsel Pty Ltd v Mowbray Golf Club Inc
2:15pm For Hearing
Vos Construction and Joinery Pty Ltd v Greg Anthony Norton-Smith
BURNIE
No list for Burnie.
______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 4 November 2015 [2015] TASSCCourtlist 241
- Case
- [2015] TASSCCourtlist 241
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court carefully reviewed the arguments presented by both the prosecution and the defence, focusing on the legal principles that guided the original trial court's decision. Justice Tennent examined whether the lower court correctly applied the law in reaching its verdict and whether the sentences imposed were appropriate. The court also considered the proportionality and fairness of the sentences given the nature of the crimes committed.
After a thorough analysis, the Court of Criminal Appeal upheld the convictions and sentences of the appellants, finding that the lower court had properly exercised its discretion and correctly applied the relevant legal principles. The appeal was dismissed, and the appellants' convictions and sentences remained unchanged. No further orders were made by the court in this matter.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.