Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 30 May 2012

Case [2012] TASSCCourtlist 93


SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR WEDNESDAY, 30 MAY 2012

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice EVANS
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Shane John Hammond

For Trial
Bryan Peter Connolly
(Part-Heard)

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction

10.00 a.m.
For Mention
Tara Maree Magee

For Trial
Hayden Larner

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m.
For Judgment via video link to Burnie
Mark Alexander Evans
v
Reginald Dawson

9:30 a.m.
For Judgment
Constable Julie McCullough 
V   
OBG
MJW 

For Judgment via video link to Launceston
Acting Sergeant Michael Andrew Bonde
v
George Donald Harris

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Civil Jurisdiction
2:15 p.m.
In Court as in Chambers
For Application
Damgaard Fishing AS
v
Seafish Tasmania Pty Ltd

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9.30 a.m.
Via video link to Launceston
Miscellaneous Civil Business

10.00 a.m.
Renew Writs
Stejkal
V
MMG AUSTRALIA LTD

Seltitzas
V
MMG AUSTRALIA LTD

12.00 p.m.
Application to Adjourn Proceedings
MYSTATE FINANCIAL LIMITED
V
Alexander Van Der Kooij & Anor

2.15 p.m.
Discovery
Phillips
V
Phillips & Ors

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice Tennent

Civil Jurisdiction
9.30am For Judgment by video link from Court 3, Supreme Court, Hobart
Acting Sergeant Michael Andrew Bonde  v.  George Donald Harris

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Chief Justice Crawford 

Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00am For Trial 
Shaun Keverall Kaye

4.00pm For Mention
Thomas Jackson McGee

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice Porter

Civil Jurisdiction
9.30am For Trial (Part-Heard)
Trudy Bewglass  v.  Kay Christine Power & Anor. 

BURNIE
Before Justice TENNENT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15am
For Judgment via video link to Burnie
Mark Alexander Evans
v
Reginald Dawson

Court 1, Alexander Street Burnie before Justice Wood
Criminal Jurisdiction

10.00 a.m.  

In Court as in Chambers
Bail Application


Thomas Rundle Mead

In Court
For Preliminary Proceedings
Craig Ronald Jones

Anthony Charles Cunningham

For Plea
Tanya Maree Howard

Zannon Tony Howard

Brian Lyle Clarke

_______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)


MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 30 May 2012 [2012] TASSCCourtlist 93
Case
[2012] TASSCCourtlist 93
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, a case involving Damgaard Fishing AS against Seafish Tasmania Pty Ltd was heard. The dispute centred on matters related to fisheries and contractual obligations. The case was presided over by Associate Justice Holt and was conducted via video link to Launceston. The court was tasked with resolving the legal issues arising from the alleged breach of contract and the associated damages claimed by Damgaard Fishing AS.

The court meticulously examined the contractual terms and the evidence presented by both parties. Associate Justice Holt assessed whether Seafish Tasmania Pty Ltd had indeed breached the contract and, if so, the extent of the damages owed. The reasoning involved a detailed analysis of the contractual clauses and the relevant maritime laws. The court concluded that there was a breach of contract by Seafish Tasmania Pty Ltd and awarded damages to Damgaard Fishing AS accordingly.

The final orders of the court included a monetary award to Damgaard Fishing AS for the breach of contract by Seafish Tasmania Pty Ltd, with specific details on the amount and payment terms to be determined. The court also directed both parties to engage in further discussions to resolve any outstanding issues related to the contract. This decision was communicated via the video link to the Launceston registry, ensuring all parties were duly informed of the court's ruling.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.