Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 3 September 2014 Summary

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR WEDNESDAY, 3 SEPTEMBER 2014

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Directions Hearing
Tony John Pettit

11:00 a.m.
For Application for Severance
David Ian Charles Coles
Derek Michael Crosswell
Jay John Bradford
(Part-heard)

2:15 p.m.
For Application to Revoke Bail via video-link to Arthur Gorrie Correctional Centre, Queensland
Jyden John Kirkpatrick

For Application for Bail
Matthew John Davey

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
11:30 a.m.
For Trial
Michael McCarthy and Eleni Margaritis
v
Vos Construction & Joinery Pty Ltd and Luke de Vries
(Part-Heard)

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
2:15 p.m.
Amend Statement of Claim
Batt
v
Burnie City Council

LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am for Bail Application
Brodie Leigh Jones

For Plea
Jarom Garth Taylor

2:15pm For Plea
Joshua Paul Birtwistle

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice Wood
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Mention via video link
Scott Clifford Mitchell

For Mention
Nicholas Mark Anderson

For Trial (part-heard)
Adam James Orme

4:00p.m.
For Directions Hearing
KA

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania was scheduled to hear several cases on 3 September 2014, primarily focusing on criminal and civil matters. The list included applications for bail, severance, and revocation of bail, as well as trials and directions hearings. In the criminal jurisdiction, cases such as pleas, bail applications, and mentions were scheduled. In civil jurisdiction, there were trials and applications to amend statements of claim. The hearing involved various parties, including individuals charged with criminal offences, companies involved in legal disputes, and applicants seeking judicial interventions.

The legal issues the court was required to decide included whether to grant or revoke bail applications, whether to allow severance of jointly charged defendants, and whether to permit amendments to statements of claim. For criminal cases, the court had to consider the risk of flight, danger to the community, and other factors relevant to bail applications. In civil matters, the court had to determine the procedural fairness of allowing amendments to pleadings and the merits of the claims and defences presented.

The court's reasoning and outcome were not detailed in the provided document. However, it is understood that each application and plea would have been assessed based on the specific facts and legal arguments presented. Decisions would have been made in accordance with relevant statutory provisions and judicial precedents. The final orders would likely have been recorded in the court's official records, detailing the outcomes of each case heard.

Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 3 September 2014

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established