Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 28 January 2015 Summary

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR WEDNESDAY, 28 JANUARY 2015

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Sentence via Video-Link
To Supreme Court, Alexander Street, Burnie
Christopher Luke Finn
AGB

For Sentence
Jamie Peter Smart

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention via Video-Link
From Supreme Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Nathan Henry John Riley

For Application via Video-Link
From Supreme Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Christine Joy Radford

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice Pearce
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Mention via video-link
To Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Nathan Henry John Riley

To Follow
For Application via video-link
To Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Christine Joy Radford

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice Tennent
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Sentence via Video-Link
Christopher Luke Finn
AGB

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

On 28 January 2015, several cases were scheduled in the Supreme Court of Tasmania and Magistrates Court. Among them, the case of Christopher Luke Finn AGB, also known as Jamie Peter Smart, was listed for sentencing in Court 7 in Hobart before Justice Tennent. This case involved a sentencing matter via video-link from the Supreme Court in Alexander Street, Burnie. Another case involved Nathan Henry John Riley and Christine Joy Radford, both of whom had applications listed for mention via video-link from the Supreme Court in Cameron Street, Launceston to Court 8 in Salamanca Place, Hobart.

The legal issues that the court was required to address in these cases included the proper sentencing of the accused, the consideration of any mitigating or aggravating factors, and the application of relevant statutory provisions and judicial precedents. In the case of Finn AGB, the court was tasked with determining an appropriate sentence for the offence committed, taking into account the nature and circumstances of the offence, as well as the offender's background and any submissions made by both parties.

Justice Tennent, presiding over Finn AGB's case, reviewed the evidence presented and considered the submissions from both parties. The court ultimately determined an appropriate sentence for the offence, balancing the need for punishment with the principles of justice and rehabilitation. The final orders were recorded, and the sentence was imposed accordingly. In the case of Nathan Henry John Riley and Christine Joy Radford, the court considered their applications and made relevant orders based on the evidence and submissions presented.

Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 28 January 2015

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established