SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR WEDNESDAY, 27 MARCH 2013
HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice EVANS
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Trial
Anthony Douglas Glass
(Part-Heard)
4.00 p.m.
For Mention
Timothy Geoffrey Briers
In Court as in Chambers
For Bail Variation
Angela Dolly Crozier
For Bail Application
Matthew Luke Johnson
Civil Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Further Directions Hearing
Joanne Frances Matthews
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Voir Dire
ALJ
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
by video link to Launceston
10.00 a.m.
For Mention
Asador Hinsta
Paul William Shaw (Snr)
Paul William Shaw (Jnr)
For Preliminary Proceedings
GCS
Luke Anthony Shaw
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
by video link to Launceston
3.00 p.m.
Application to Vary Bail
Joseph Cohen Rogers
4.00 p.m.
For Sentence
Kevin Lawrence Davenport
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
2.15 p.m.
For Hearing
National Australia Bank Limited
v
Ahipene & Anor
(Part-Heard)
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice Wood by video-link from Court 7, Supreme Court, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00am For Mention
Asador Hinsta
Paul William Shaw (Senior)
Paul William Shaw (Junior)
For Preliminary Proceedings
GCS
Luke Anthony Shaw
3.00pm Application to Vary Bail
Joseph Cohen Rogers
4.00pm For Sentence
Kevin Lawrence Davenport
BURNIE
No list for Burnie
_______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 27 March 2013 [2013] TASSCCourtlist 46
- Case
- [2013] TASSCCourtlist 46
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues in these cases varied. For the criminal trials, the primary issue was whether the prosecution could prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. In the case of Joanne Frances Matthews, the court needed to determine the next steps in the proceedings. For the civil case, the key issue was whether the defendants were liable for the claims made by the National Australia Bank Limited.
The reasoning and outcome of these cases were not detailed in the provided extract. However, the Supreme Court of Tasmania would have considered the evidence presented, the applicable law, and made decisions based on the merits of each case. The court's decisions would have been communicated to the parties involved and recorded in the court's official records.
No final orders were mentioned in the provided extract. However, the court would have issued appropriate orders in each case based on its findings and the applicable law. These orders would have been communicated to the parties and enforced as necessary.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.