SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR WEDNESDAY, 25 MAY 2016
HOBART
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Stephen Roy Standage
v
State of Tasmania
(Part-Heard)
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
In Court as in Chambers
For Hearing
Jenny Branch-Allen
v
Barry Easther and Lynn Mason
(Part-Heard)
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
In Court
For Mention via video-link to Court 1, Launceston
Kaitlyn Amy Megan Lockwood
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Civil Jurisdiction
4.30 p.m.
For Judgment
Lyell John Knowles & Ors as Trustees of the Estate of Fred French
v
The Honourable Vanessa Goodwin in her capacity as the Attorney-General for the State of Tasmania
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Holly Raper (by her Litigation Guardian Elaine Raper)
v
David Bowden and anor
(Part-Heard)
In Chambers, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Civil Jurisdiction
4:15pm
For Final Orders
Paul Francis Allison v Tuna Tasmania Pty Ltd and Ors
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing via video link to Launceston and Burnie
Lee Shaw
V
Beverley Hanlon
12:00 p.m.
For Hearing
Public Trustee as administrator of the Estate of Rex Klye
V
Rodney Klye & ors
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15pm For Mention via video-link to Court 7, Hobart
Kaitlyn Amy Megan Lockwood
BURNIE
No list for Burnie.
______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 25 May 2016 [2016] TASSCCourtlist 105
- Case
- [2016] TASSCCourtlist 105
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court in this case would encompass the interpretation and application of criminal law, the procedural fairness of the trial, and any potential errors in the lower court's decision that may have affected the outcome. The court's task would be to review the evidence and legal arguments presented by both parties to determine whether the appeal should be upheld or dismissed.
The court's reasoning and outcome in this case are not provided in the document, and thus remain undisclosed. The court would have considered the merits of the appeal, the validity of the arguments presented, and the legal precedents applicable to the case. The final orders and judgment, if any, would follow the court's deliberation and would be communicated to the parties involved.
Additionally, the law lists include various other hearings and judgments in both civil and criminal jurisdictions, indicating a busy schedule for the Supreme Court of Tasmania on this particular day. The document also highlights the use of video links for some hearings, reflecting the court's efforts to accommodate remote participation.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.