SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR WEDNESDAY, 25 MAY 2016
HOBART
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Stephen Roy Standage
v
State of Tasmania
(Part-Heard)
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
In Court as in Chambers
For Hearing
Jenny Branch-Allen
v
Barry Easther and Lynn Mason
(Part-Heard)
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
In Court
For Mention via video-link to Court 1, Launceston
Kaitlyn Amy Megan Lockwood
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Civil Jurisdiction
4.30 p.m.
For Judgment
Lyell John Knowles & Ors as Trustees of the Estate of Fred French
v
The Honourable Vanessa Goodwin in her capacity as the Attorney-General for the State of Tasmania
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Holly Raper (by her Litigation Guardian Elaine Raper)
v
David Bowden and anor
(Part-Heard)
In Chambers, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Civil Jurisdiction
4:15pm
For Final Orders
Paul Francis Allison v Tuna Tasmania Pty Ltd and Ors
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing via video link to Launceston and Burnie
Lee Shaw
V
Beverley Hanlon
12:00 p.m.
For Hearing
Public Trustee as administrator of the Estate of Rex Klye
V
Rodney Klye & ors
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15pm For Mention via video-link to Court 7, Hobart
Kaitlyn Amy Megan Lockwood
BURNIE
No list for Burnie.
______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 25 May 2016 [2016] TASSCCourtlist 104
- Case
- [2016] TASSCCourtlist 104
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues in these cases likely pertained to the interpretation and application of relevant laws and statutes, as well as the procedural correctness of the decisions made in the lower courts. For example, in the Standage case, the court might have been required to consider whether the trial court had correctly applied the law or if there were any procedural errors that could have affected the outcome. In the Knowles case, the court might have been examining the validity of governmental actions or the interpretation of estate laws.
The reasoning and outcome of these cases were not detailed in the law lists, but they would typically involve the court's analysis of the arguments presented by both parties, review of the evidence and legal precedents, and application of relevant statutes and case law. The Supreme Court's decisions in these cases would have significant implications for the parties involved and could potentially set precedents for similar cases in the future.
The final orders of these cases were not provided in the law lists, but they would have been communicated to the parties involved and recorded in the court's official records. The outcomes would have addressed the specific legal issues raised and provided a resolution to the disputes in accordance with the law.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.