SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR WEDNESDAY, 25 MARCH 2015
HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Dylan Keith Knight
Brodie John Self
(Part-Heard)
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Christopher Paul Minehan
Daniel John Oakley
Jason Linley Bell
For Trial
Denison Ong Chin Jui
Nicholas David McWilliams
Joseph Andrew Edwards
(Part Heard)
4:15 p.m.
For Sentence
Ian Bruce Rushton
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Troy Leslie Eirth
v
Geoffrey Arthur Spaulding
(Part-Heard)
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00am For Trial (Part Heard)
Marco Daniel Rusterholz
Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice Tennent
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 am For Mention
Michael John Hess
GCS
For Trial
Stewart Robert McLean
Benjamin Shay Hosking
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice Wood
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Trial (part-heard)
Jamie Laurence Carrick
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
FWH
Benjamin Shane Moran
For Trial
Justin Raynor Bott
______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 25 March 2015 [2015] TASSCCourtlist 51
- Case
- [2015] TASSCCourtlist 51
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues addressed in these cases ranged from the continuation of trials to the mention of cases pending further court action, and the sentencing of an individual. Each case presented distinct legal challenges, necessitating the court's attention to various procedural and substantive matters. The judges were tasked with managing the flow of evidence, addressing procedural applications, and ensuring that the rights of all parties were safeguarded throughout the proceedings.
The reasoning and outcomes of the cases were influenced by the nature of each proceeding. In trials, the court focused on the admissibility of evidence and the application of legal principles to the facts presented. Sentencing involved the consideration of mitigating and aggravating factors, alongside the appropriate legal penalties for the offenses committed. Mentions were used to schedule further hearings and manage the progression of cases. Each case was handled with due regard to the legal standards and procedural fairness expected in the Tasmanian judicial system.
The final orders of the court included the continuation of trials, the scheduling of future hearings, and the sentencing of Ian Bruce Rushton, reflecting the court's commitment to efficiently and justly resolving each matter before it.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.