SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR WEDNESDAY, 23 MARCH 2016
HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Lawrence Bernard Sullivan
(Part-heard)
4:00 p.m.
For Submissions via Video-Link to Mary Hutchinson Women’s Prison
Gail Lynne Delpero
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention via Video-Link
Craig Anthony Devine
Justin Craig Cleaver
Phillip Dare
For Breach Application
Michael Ross Stringer
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:45 a.m.
For Directions Hearing
Joseph Andrew Edwards
v
State of Tasmania
Civil Jurisdiction
In Court as in Chambers
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Jenny Branch-Allen
v
Barry Easther and Lynn Mason
In Court as in Chambers
2:00 p.m.
For Judgment
Tara Lamont
v
MRD Supermarkets Pty Ltd t/a Triabunna IGA Everyday
In Court
2:15 p.m.
For Judgment
Senior Constable Scott Wilkie
v
Peter Christian Cohen
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
In Court For Mention
Andrew Dickson
Chantelle Jean Brent
Richard Dennis McGowan
Michael Rigby
Paul Lance Broad
Ty Scott Hammond
Paul William Shaw (Jnr.)
To Follow
For Application to Vary Bail
Caine Robert Richardson
To Follow
For Directions Hearing via video-link to Risdon Prison Complex
Luke James Reader
To Follow
For Plea
Mitchaell Leonard Daking Millier
BURNIE
No list for Burnie.
______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 23 March 2016 [2016] TASSCCourtlist 57
- Case
- [2016] TASSCCourtlist 57
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was required to make decisions on various legal issues. These included determining whether the defendant in the criminal cases was guilty of the charges brought against them, deciding on bail applications, and ruling on civil disputes between the parties involved. The court also needed to consider whether there had been a breach of the law and if any party was entitled to damages.
The court's reasoning and outcome were not detailed in the provided text. However, the court was expected to make decisions based on the evidence presented and the relevant laws. The court's final orders would be made public once the hearings and deliberations were complete. The court aimed to ensure that justice was served and that the rights of all parties involved were protected.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.