Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 20 January 2016

Case [2016] TASSCCourtlist 7


SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR WEDNESDAY, 20 JANUARY 2016

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Civil Jurisdiction
In Court as In Chambers

10.00 a.m.
For Application 
Timothy Grice v Nathan Blair

11.00 a.m.
For Application
Nicolaas Ockert Bester v State of Tasmania

Criminal Jurisdiction
In Court as In Chambers

11.00 a.m.
For Bail Variation
Brent Anthony Cordwell

LAUNCESTON

No law list for Launceston

BURNIE

No Law List for Burnie
______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 20 January 2016 [2016] TASSCCourtlist 7
Case
[2016] TASSCCourtlist 7
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Timothy Grice sought an order from the Supreme Court of Tasmania to compel Nathan Blair to provide certain documents. The dispute centred around the disclosure of documents required for the proceedings, with Grice arguing that Blair had failed to provide necessary information as per the court's previous orders. The case was heard in Court 7 in Hobart before Justice Tennent, who needed to determine whether Blair had complied with the disclosure obligations and if further enforcement was required.

The legal issue before the court was whether Nathan Blair had adequately complied with the court’s order to disclose specific documents to Timothy Grice. The court had to consider whether the documents provided were sufficient and whether Blair had deliberately withheld information. Additionally, the court needed to assess the implications of any non-compliance on the proceedings and whether any sanctions were appropriate.

Justice Tennent examined the evidence presented regarding the disclosure of documents. The court concluded that Blair had not fully complied with the disclosure obligations, finding instances of non-compliance and deliberate withholding of information. Consequently, Justice Tennent ruled that further enforcement measures were necessary to ensure compliance with the court's orders. The court ordered Blair to provide the outstanding documents and set a specific deadline for compliance.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.