SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR WEDNESDAY, 20 FEBRUARY 2013
HOBART
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Further Directions
Mark William Eather
For Preliminary Proceedings
Tye Matthew Curtain
For Trial
CJC
(Part Heard)
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart via video-link to Burnie
Before Justice EVANS
Civil Jurisdiction
3.30 p.m.
For Hearing
Greg Hocking
v
Timothy Thomas Loane
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Chief Justice Crawford
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00am For Mention
Gerrard Enes Berberovic
Colin David Picard
For Directions Hearing
BBWF
For Trial (Part-Heard)
Matthew Wayne Leslie
Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Associate Justice Holt
Civil Jurisdiction
10.00am For Hearing (Part-Heard)
Blackley Investments Pty. Ltd. v. Burnie City Council
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street Burnie before Justice Evans
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Mention
Stephen James Gatenby
Alan Robert Arkinstall
For Preliminary Proceedings Application
Ricky Thomas Bramich
For Trial
BNT
(Part-Heard)
To Follow
For Disputed Facts Hearing
Paul Kevin Bartlett
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie via video-link to Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
3:30 p.m.
Civil Jurisdiction
For Hearing
Greg Hocking
v
Timothy Thomas Loane
_______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 20 February 2013 [2013] TASSCCourtlist 20
- Case
- [2013] TASSCCourtlist 20
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues in the civil case between Greg Hocking and Timothy Thomas Loane likely revolve around disputes over contractual obligations, property rights, or personal injury claims, given the nature of civil litigation. The specific grounds of the dispute were not detailed in the provided text, but it is clear that the case was significant enough to warrant a hearing before the Supreme Court. The criminal cases listed involve a variety of charges and stages of proceedings, from initial mentions to full trials, suggesting a mix of minor and more serious offences under consideration.
The reasoning and outcome of the proceedings are not detailed in the provided text, and it is likely that the outcomes varied across the different cases. The Supreme Court would have considered the evidence presented, applicable laws, and legal precedents in reaching its decisions. Given the high court setting, it can be inferred that the decisions would have been carefully deliberated and based on rigorous legal standards. The final orders for each case would be documented in the court's records, providing specific details on the resolutions reached.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.