Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 20 February 2013

Case [2013] TASSCCourtlist 20


SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR WEDNESDAY, 20 FEBRUARY 2013

HOBART

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction

10.00 a.m.  

For Further Directions

Mark William Eather

For Preliminary Proceedings

Tye Matthew Curtain

For Trial

CJC

(Part Heard)

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart via video-link to Burnie
Before Justice EVANS
Civil Jurisdiction
3.30 p.m.  
For Hearing
Greg Hocking

v

Timothy Thomas Loane 

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Chief Justice Crawford 
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00am For Mention
Gerrard Enes Berberovic
Colin David Picard

For Directions Hearing
BBWF

For Trial (Part-Heard)
Matthew Wayne Leslie

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Associate Justice Holt
Civil Jurisdiction
10.00am For Hearing (Part-Heard)
Blackley Investments Pty. Ltd.  v.  Burnie City Council

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street Burnie before Justice Evans
Criminal Jurisdiction

10.00 a.m.
For Mention
Stephen James Gatenby
Alan Robert Arkinstall

For Preliminary Proceedings Application
Ricky Thomas Bramich

For Trial
BNT  
(Part-Heard)

To Follow
For Disputed Facts Hearing
Paul Kevin Bartlett

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie via video-link to Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
3:30 p.m.
Civil Jurisdiction
For Hearing
Greg Hocking
v
Timothy Thomas Loane 

_______________________________________________________

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 20 February 2013 [2013] TASSCCourtlist 20
Case
[2013] TASSCCourtlist 20
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 20 February 2013, details various criminal and civil proceedings scheduled for that day. The civil proceedings, particularly those involving Greg Hocking versus Timothy Thomas Loane, were listed for hearing in multiple locations including Hobart, Launceston, and Burnie. These cases were set for hearings before different justices, indicating the breadth and complexity of matters being addressed by the court. The criminal proceedings listed include mentions, preliminary proceedings, directions hearings, and trials, indicating an ongoing engagement with a range of criminal cases.

The legal issues in the civil case between Greg Hocking and Timothy Thomas Loane likely revolve around disputes over contractual obligations, property rights, or personal injury claims, given the nature of civil litigation. The specific grounds of the dispute were not detailed in the provided text, but it is clear that the case was significant enough to warrant a hearing before the Supreme Court. The criminal cases listed involve a variety of charges and stages of proceedings, from initial mentions to full trials, suggesting a mix of minor and more serious offences under consideration.

The reasoning and outcome of the proceedings are not detailed in the provided text, and it is likely that the outcomes varied across the different cases. The Supreme Court would have considered the evidence presented, applicable laws, and legal precedents in reaching its decisions. Given the high court setting, it can be inferred that the decisions would have been carefully deliberated and based on rigorous legal standards. The final orders for each case would be documented in the court's records, providing specific details on the resolutions reached.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.