Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 2 September 2015

Case [2015] TASSCCourtlist 188


SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR WEDNESDAY, 2 SEPTEMBER 2015

HOBART
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.
For Trial

The Queen
v
Russell David Potter
Mures Fishing Pty Ltd
(part-heard)

4:00 p.m.
For Directions Hearing
Stuart Malcolm Allen

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT

Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Legal Argument  
Brodie Leigh Price

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT

Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Ewing & Anor v Howes & Ors

12:30 p.m.
Renew Writ
Kernan v Hunt

2:15 p.m.
Vary orders
Cooper v Nuebert

4:00 p.m.
Directions Hearing by telephone
Jason Weller Plumbing Pty Ltd v Tasmania Mines Limited

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice WOOD

Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Trial (Part-Heard)

Sean Gregory Richardson
Damien Wesley Marshall

BURNIE
No list for Burnie

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 2 September 2015 [2015] TASSCCourtlist 188
Case
[2015] TASSCCourtlist 188
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania has scheduled various hearings for Wednesday, 2 September 2015. In the criminal jurisdiction, the court will hear a case against Russell David Potter and Mures Fishing Pty Ltd, which is part-heard. Additionally, Stuart Malcolm Allen is scheduled for a directions hearing. In the civil jurisdiction, there is a hearing for the case of Ewing & Anor v Howes & Ors, followed by a renewal writ for Kernan v Hunt. The court will also consider varying orders in Cooper v Nuebert and a directions hearing for Jason Weller Plumbing Pty Ltd v Tasmania Mines Limited. In Launceston, Sean Gregory Richardson and Damien Wesley Marshall are set for a trial, which is also part-heard.

The legal issues before the Supreme Court of Tasmania involve both criminal and civil matters. The criminal cases include hearings for directions and trials, raising questions about the admissibility of evidence, the application of criminal laws, and the rights of the defendants. In the civil cases, the court will address issues such as the renewal of writs, variations of orders, and legal arguments presented by the parties. The court must ensure that the proceedings adhere to procedural fairness and that the rights of all parties are protected. The outcomes will depend on the evidence presented and the interpretation of the relevant laws.

The Supreme Court of Tasmania is expected to provide detailed reasoning for its decisions in each case. In the criminal cases, the court will consider the evidence and arguments to determine the guilt or innocence of the defendants. In the civil cases, the court will examine the merits of the applications and decide whether to renew writs or vary orders. The court's decisions will be guided by legal precedents, statutory provisions, and the principles of justice. The final orders will reflect the court's findings on the specific issues raised in each case.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.