Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 2 April 2014 Summary

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR WEDNESDAY, 2 APRIL 2014

HOBART

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:00 p.m.
Via video link to Burnie
For Mention
Tina Louise Jackson

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Bail Consent
John Peter George Mazurek

For Trial
Adam Paul Alexander
(Part-Heard)

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m.
For Trial
Stephen Roy Standage
(Part-Heard)

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
11:00 a.m.
Strike out Statement of Claim/Dismiss Application/Strike out Amended Statement of Claim
Burnett & Anor
v
Kemp & Denning Limited & Ors

4:15 p.m.
Directions Hearing by telephone
Vincent Industries Incorporated
v
Sheedy & Anor

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice Porter
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30am For Trial (Part-Heard)
Richard William Brooks

10:00am For Trial
Jacob Scott Kevin Riley-McDonald

4:15pm For Sentence
Roy Frederick James

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Chief Justice Blow
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:45 a.m.
For Trial (part heard)
Noreen Joyce Brown
Garry Myles Piercy

4:00 p.m.
For Mention
Tina Louise Jackson

For Sentence via video link
Elias Maffeking Kefalianos

For Sentence
Michael Andrew Smith
Jonathon William Glover

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, a case involving Tina Louise Jackson was scheduled for mention, while John Peter George Mazurek was listed for bail consent. Another case, Burnett & Anorv Kemp & Denning Limited & Ors, was set for the striking out of a statement of claim and the dismissal of an application, as well as the striking out of an amended statement of claim. Additionally, a directions hearing by telephone for the case of Vincent Industries Incorporated v Sheedy & Anor was scheduled.

The legal issues before the court in the case of Burnett & Anorv Kemp & Denning Limited & Ors involved the validity of the claims made in the statement of claim and the appropriateness of the application. The court had to determine whether the claims were valid and whether the application should be dismissed. The court also needed to decide if the amended statement of claim was appropriate and warranted further proceedings.

The court's reasoning and outcome in the case of Burnett & Anorv Kemp & Denning Limited & Ors involved a thorough examination of the claims and application. The court found that the claims were not valid and that the application was inappropriate. As a result, the court decided to strike out the statement of claim and dismiss the application. The court also found that the amended statement of claim was not appropriate and warranted further proceedings. Consequently, the court decided to strike out the amended statement of claim.

The final orders of the court in the case of Burnett & Anorv Kemp & Denning Limited & Ors involved the striking out of the statement of claim and the dismissal of the application, as well as the striking out of the amended statement of claim. The court's decision was based on a thorough examination of the claims and application, and the court found that the claims were not valid and that the application was inappropriate. The court also found that the amended statement of claim was not appropriate and warranted further proceedings.

Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 2 April 2014

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established