Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 19 November 2014

Case [2014] TASSCCourtlist 248


SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR WEDNESDAY, 19 NOVEMBER 2014

HOBART
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Leah Lesley Cannon

4:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing
David John Hurd

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Sentence via Video-Link from Supreme Court, Alexander Street, Burnie
Nathan Robert Griffith

For Sentence and for Application to Review a Suspended Sentence via Video-Link from Supreme Court, Alexander Street, Burnie
Darren Leigh White

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Dwight Stanley Murtagh
(Part Heard)

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Sentence via video link to Supreme Court, Alexander Street, Burnie
Dylan Ray Webb

10:00 a.m. (not before 10:30 a.m.)

For Mention
Zachary Jacob Jones
Derek Leslie Graeme Smith

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
Directions Hearing by Telephone
Tastrans Enterprises Pty Ltd
v
Henderson

4:30 p.m.
For Mention by Telephone
Gunns Finance Pty Ltd
v
Kuragamage

Gunns Finance Pty Ltd
v
Colvin

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice Pearce
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Trial (Part Heard)
Alissa Margaret Moore
Mark Andrew Jenkins

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice Estcourt
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Trial (Part Heard)
Adrian John Hall

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice Tennent
Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.

For Mention

Mark Raymond Roland

For Trial

Jason Noel Rowe

(Part-Heard)

4:15 p.m.

For Sentence via Video-Link to Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Nathan Robert Griffith

For Sentence and for Application to Review a Suspended Sentence via Video-Link to Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Darren Leigh White

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 19 November 2014 [2014] TASSCCourtlist 248
Case
[2014] TASSCCourtlist 248
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

On 19 November 2014, the Supreme Court of Tasmania had a range of criminal and civil cases listed for hearing. In the criminal jurisdiction, the court was set to hear trials, directions hearings, and sentencing for several defendants. Notable cases included Leah Lesley Cannon, whose trial was scheduled for the morning, and Nathan Robert Griffith and Darren Leigh White, whose sentencing was scheduled for the afternoon via video-link from Burnie. Additionally, there were part-heard trials for Dwight Stanley Murtagh and Jason Noel Rowe. In the civil jurisdiction, Tastrans Enterprises Pty Ltd was scheduled for a directions hearing by telephone, and Gunns Finance Pty Ltd had mentions by telephone regarding cases against Kurugamage and Colvin.

The legal issues in the criminal cases ranged from determining guilt in ongoing trials to assessing appropriate sentences for convicted individuals. The court needed to consider the evidence presented, the defendants' criminal histories, and any mitigating or aggravating factors. For the civil cases, the primary issues were procedural, focusing on the direction of the hearings and the progress of the litigation. The court was tasked with ensuring that the hearings adhered to legal protocols and that the parties were prepared to proceed.

The reasoning and outcomes of the cases were not detailed in the extract. The court would have considered the arguments presented by the legal representatives of both parties, examined the evidence, and applied relevant laws and legal principles to reach decisions. The outcomes would depend on the specific facts of each case and the application of the law. The final orders would be communicated separately and would detail the court's decisions on guilt, sentencing, or procedural directives.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.