SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR WEDNESDAY, 18 MARCH 2015
HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
9.45 a.m.
For Mention
Shaun Mathew Dimech
10.00 a.m
For Trial
Nathan Grant Chatters
(Part-Heard)
Not Before 11.30am
For Legal Argument
Garry Maxwell Billinghurst
(Part Heard)
4.00pm
For Bail Application
Kevin Laurence Davenport
Adrian James Jeffries
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Bail Consent
Ethan Scott Cooper
Melissa Louise Dance
Denison Ong Chin Jui
Nicholas David McWilliams
Joseph Andrew Edwards
For Mention
A Witness
A Witness
A Witness
For Trial
Christopher Paul Minehan
(Part Heard)
4:15 p.m.
For Sentence
Nicholas James White
For Plea in Mitigation
DKM
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Troy Leslie Eirth
v
Geoffrey Arthur Spaulding
(Part-Heard)
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
2:00 p.m.
Directions Hearing by Telephone
Forest Enterprises Australia Limited (Administrators Appointed)
v
Galbraith
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00am For Trial (Part Heard)
Marco Daniel Rusterholz
4:00 pm for Bail Application
Sean Gregory Richardson
Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Michael John Hess
A Witness
For Bail Consent
GCS
For Trial
Benjamin Thomas Lynch
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice Wood
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Justin Raynor Bott
For Trial (part-heard)
Glenn Paul Watts
______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 18 March 2015 [2015] TASSCCourtlist 46
- Case
- [2015] TASSCCourtlist 46
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was required to decide a range of legal issues, including bail applications, mentions, trials, and sentencing. In the criminal cases, the court had to consider whether the accused individuals should be granted bail and what the appropriate conditions for bail should be. In the civil case, the court had to determine the directions for the proceeding, including the scheduling of further hearings and the exchange of evidence. Additionally, the court had to consider the merits of the case in the part-heard trial between Troy Leslie Eirth and Geoffrey Arthur Spaulding, including the admissibility of evidence and the application of relevant legal principles.
The court's reasoning and outcome varied depending on the specific case. In the bail applications, the court considered the accused's likelihood of appearing in court, the risk of reoffending, and the potential impact on the community. In some cases, the court granted bail with conditions, while in others, the court denied bail. In the part-heard trial between Troy Leslie Eirth and Geoffrey Arthur Spaulding, the court heard evidence and arguments from both parties and made interim findings on the admissibility of certain evidence. The court also provided directions for the scheduling of further hearings and the exchange of evidence. In the criminal cases, the court considered the evidence presented and made findings on the guilt or innocence of the accused individuals. In some cases, the court found the accused guilty and sentenced them accordingly, while in others, the court found the accused not guilty.
In summary, the Supreme Court of Tasmania heard a range of criminal and civil cases on Wednesday, 18 March 2015. The court was required to decide a range of legal issues, including bail applications, mentions, trials, and sentencing. The court's reasoning and outcome varied depending on the specific case, with some cases resulting in bail being granted or denied, while others resulted in findings of guilt or innocence and appropriate sentences.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.