Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 17 June 2015 Summary

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR WEDNESDAY, 17 JUNE 2015

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Mark William Eather
(Part-Heard)

4:15 p.m.
For Preliminary Proceedings Application via Video-Link to Risdon Prison Complex
Matthew James Linton

For Sentence
Elsawi Ahmed Eldayar
Mohamad Bastoni

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice Porter
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Application
Stuart Alexander Ferguson

For Plea in Mitigation
Michael Samuel Charlesworth

For Preliminary Proceedings
George Joseph Billinski

In Court as in Chambers
For Bail Application
Daniel Wheatley

In Court
4:15 p.m. by video-link to Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
For Sentence
CMM

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:00 a.m.
For Disputed Facts Hearing
Brayden Richard William Vince

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Denis Ross Tringrove
Robin Glen Fahey
(Part-Heard)

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
4:00 p.m.
Directions Hearing by Telephone
Ricky Charles
v
Suncorp Life and Superannuation Limited

LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE

Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00am For Remand
Paul John Warren

To Follow For Trial (Part-Heard)
Luke James Reader
Christina Vernessa Watson

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15pm For Sentence by video-link from Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
CMM

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Chief Justice Blow
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Michael Robert Keeling

For Preliminary Proceedings Application
Jeremy Stephen Lane

For Facts and Sentence
Keiren Jayson Hays

For Application
Leighton Allan Stokes

For Plea
David Alexander Swan
Zachary Alexander Swan
Denise Michelle Morrissey

Not before 12:00 p.m.
For Directions Hearings
Aaron Samuel Henrick
David John Fitzpatrick
BLP
Rodney Charles Popowski

2:15 pm
For Trial
Stephen Matthew Biggs
(Part-Heard)

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania was convened on Wednesday, 17 June 2015, with various criminal and civil proceedings scheduled across different courts in Hobart, Launceston, and Burnie. In Hobart, Justice TENNENT presided over criminal trials and sentence hearings, including cases involving Mark William Eather and Elsawi Ahmed Eldayar, while Justice PORTER handled applications and preliminary proceedings. In Launceston, Justice PEARCE was scheduled to handle remands and trial mentions, with Justice PORTER conducting a sentence hearing via video-link from Hobart. Chief Justice BLOW in Burnie presided over mentions, applications, and a trial part-heard involving Stephen Matthew Biggs. Associate Justice HOLT in Hobart was set for a civil directions hearing in a case involving Ricky Charles against Suncorp Life and Superannuation Limited.

The court faced several legal issues, including the determination of disputed facts in the case of Brayden Richard William Vince, the plea in mitigation for Michael Samuel Charlesworth, and the handling of bail applications and preliminary proceedings for various defendants. Justices were also required to decide on the appropriate sentences for defendants based on the evidence and legal arguments presented. The court's role extended to ensuring procedural fairness in both criminal and civil matters, including the management of video-link proceedings and telephone directions hearings.

The Supreme Court of Tasmania addressed these issues through a series of hearings and applications, providing rulings and directions as necessary. Justices TENNENT, PORTER, WOOD, ESTCOURT, PEARCE, BLOW, and HOLT each played a role in managing the proceedings, ensuring that the legal rights of the defendants were upheld while also considering the interests of the victims and the public. The court's decisions reflected the importance of due process and the need for timely and fair resolution of the cases before them.

The final orders of the court were not detailed in the document, but they would have included rulings on the applications, pleas, and sentences, as well as any directions or further orders required for the ongoing or future proceedings.

Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 17 June 2015

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established