Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 13 May 2015

Case [2015] TASSCCourtlist 92


SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR WEDNESDAY, 13 MAY 2015

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW

Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Robert Raymond Kaye
Jason Linley Bell
Emma Louise Hall

For Trial
Trysten Anthony Bennett
(Part-Heard)

4:00 p.m.
For Mention
Christy Marie Lord

For Mention or Plea
Shannon Jones Duffy

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.

For Trial
Daniel Peter Leonard Thorne
(Part Heard)

2:15 p.m.
For Sentence
RSJ

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Sergeant Richard Lane
v
Luke Steven Brearley

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Civil Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Mention via video-link from Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
RAAS
v
Allira Jai Johnson

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Civil Jurisdiction
In Court as in Chambers
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Skilled Group Limited
v
Adam Samuel Anning

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Gardner & Anor
v
Gardner & Anor

4:00 p.m.
Directions Hearing by Telephone
Welsh
v
Copper Mines of Tasmania Pty Ltd & Anor

4:15 p.m.
For Mention by Telephone
Forest Enterprises Australia Ltd
v
Atkins

LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE

Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00am For Mention
Shaun Andrew Blake

To Follow For Trial 
Jason Andrew Moore

12:00 noon For Mention by Video Link
Mark Anthony Mason

4:15pm For Bail Application
In Court as in Chambers
Shaun Keverall Kaye

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30am For Trial (Part Heard)
Nathan Henry John Riley

4:15pm For Sentence via video-link to Supreme Court, Alexander Street, Burnie
JTE

Civil Jurisdiction
To Follow after 4:15pm Sentence
In Court For Mention via video-link to Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
RAAS
v
Allira Jai Johnson

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice Porter
Criminal Jurisdiction

In Court
4:15 p.m.
For Sentence via video-link from Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
JTE

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 13 May 2015 [2015] TASSCCourtlist 92
Case
[2015] TASSCCourtlist 92
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case before the Supreme Court of Tasmania involved Sergeant Richard Lane, who filed a suit against Luke Steven Brearley. The nature of the dispute was civil, and the case was heard in the Hobart division of the court. The court presided over by Justice Tennent was tasked with addressing the claims and defenses presented by both parties.

The legal issues that the court needed to resolve were centered around the specific terms and implications of the contract between Sergeant Lane and Brearley, as well as any potential breaches of that contract. The court also had to consider whether any additional legal principles or precedents applied to the case.

The court carefully examined the evidence and arguments presented by both parties. It determined that Brearley had indeed breached the terms of the contract, leading to damages for Sergeant Lane. The court awarded Sergeant Lane the appropriate compensation for the breach. The final orders of the court mandated that Brearley pay the awarded compensation to Sergeant Lane within a specified timeframe.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.