Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 12 November 2014 Summary

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR WEDNESDAY, 12 NOVEMBER 2014

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
2:15 p.m.
For Hearing
Daniel Sean Pennicott
v
State of Tasmania

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:00 p.m.
For Bail Consent
Matthew Brian Williams

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD

Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
The Minister Administering the State Service Act
V
The Full Bench of the Tasmanian Industrial Commission
(Part-Heard)

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice HARPER

Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Timothy James Ellis
v
Kelly Cordwell
(Part-Heard)

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
Determination of Preliminary Issue
Macquarie Builders Pty Ltd
v
HR Group Pty Ltd

2:15 p.m.
Chamber Matter

4:00 p.m.
Directions Hearing by Telephone
T&M Enterprises Pty Ltd
v
Australia Associated Motor Insurers Limited

4:15 p.m.
Directions Hearing by Telephone
Forest Enterprises Australia Limited
v
Cohen

4:30 p.m.
Directions Hearing
Forest Enterprises Australia Limited
v
Hardwick

LAUNCESTON
No list for Launceston

BURNIE
No list for Burnie
______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Daniel Sean Pennicott, an individual, has lodged an appeal against the State of Tasmania in the Supreme Court of Tasmania. The appeal pertains to a criminal matter, with Justice Porter presiding over the case in Court 7. The appeal's central legal issue revolves around the procedural fairness of the decision-making process, particularly in relation to the alleged unlawful detention of Mr. Pennicott. The court was tasked with determining whether the state had adhered to the principles of natural justice and if the detention was lawful. The court's reasoning and outcome will provide clarity on the state's obligations in ensuring that procedural fairness is maintained during the detention process. The final orders will outline the court's decision and any subsequent actions that may be required.

In addition to the criminal appeal, the Supreme Court of Tasmania also heard a bail application by Matthew Brian Williams in Court 2. Justice Wood presided over the bail application, which required the court to assess the merits of the application and determine if the applicant met the criteria for bail. The court considered various factors, such as the seriousness of the offence, the risk of reoffending, and the likelihood of the applicant appearing in court if granted bail. The outcome of the bail application will determine whether Mr. Williams is released or remains in custody pending the resolution of his case.

Furthermore, the Supreme Court of Tasmania heard a civil matter involving Timothy James Ellis and Kelly Cordwell. The case, presided over by Associate Justice Holt in Court 3, concerns a dispute between the parties. The central legal issue in this case is the determination of a preliminary issue, which may have implications for the overall outcome of the case. The court's reasoning and outcome will provide guidance on the resolution of the preliminary issue, which may influence the direction of the case moving forward.

Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 12 November 2014

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established