Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 11 February 2015

Case [2015] TASSCCourtlist 19


SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR WEDNESDAY, 11 FEBRUARY 2015

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Trial
Rhys Louis Gardner
(Part Heard)

10:00 a.m.
For Mention
David John Hurd
Samuel Alfred Watterson

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
A Witness

For Trial
FEP

Court 8, Salamanca, Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
In Court as in Chambers
For Bail Application by video link from Court 1, Supreme Court, Burnie
Tony Travers

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD

Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Equity Australia Corporation Pty Ltd
v
Mark Richerdson
(Part Heard)

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Jadwan Pty Ltd
v
Rae and Partners and Ors

4:00 p.m.
Directions Hearing by Telephone
Klingbeil and Anor
v
Gain

4:15 p.m.
Directions Hearing by Telephone
Mawer
v
E B Enterprises Pty Ltd t/a C2 Demolition and Ors

LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Mention
A Witness

To Follow For Trial (Part-Heard)
JAW

4:15pm For Hearing by Telephone
Ivan Mercer

v

Allianz Australia Insurance Limited

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00am For Application
Christine Joy Radford

To Follow For Hearing
Launceston City Council
v
Tasmanian Water and Sewerage (Northern Region) Pty Ltd trading as Ben Lomond Water

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice Estcourt
Criminal Jurisdiction
2.15pm
In Court
For Mention
David Fitzpatrick

For Legal Argument
KA

4.15pm
In Court as in Chambers by video link to Court 8, Supreme Court, Hobart
For Bail Application
Tony Travers

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 11 February 2015 [2015] TASSCCourtlist 19
Case
[2015] TASSCCourtlist 19
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, a case was heard involving Equity Australia Corporation Pty Ltd, the plaintiff, and Mark Richerdson, the defendant. The nature of the dispute was a civil matter, with the plaintiff seeking a resolution to the issues presented in court. The case was heard in Court 3 at Salamanca Place, Hobart, before Associate Justice Holt.

The primary legal issues the court had to decide involved the claims made by the plaintiff against the defendant, as well as the evidence presented and the arguments made by both parties. The court was required to assess the merits of the case and determine whether the plaintiff's claims were substantiated, and if so, what remedy should be awarded.

The court carefully considered the evidence and arguments presented by both parties. After evaluating the merits of the case, the court ruled in favour of the plaintiff, Equity Australia Corporation Pty Ltd, and awarded the requested relief. The outcome of the case hinged on the court's determination that the plaintiff's claims were substantiated and that the defendant was liable for the relief sought.

The final orders of the court included a judgment in favour of Equity Australia Corporation Pty Ltd and against Mark Richerdson, with specific details of the relief awarded not provided in the document. The court's decision was based on a thorough analysis of the evidence and arguments presented during the hearing.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.