Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 11 February 2015

Case [2015] TASSCCourtlist 21


SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR WEDNESDAY, 11 FEBRUARY 2015

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Trial
Rhys Louis Gardner
(Part Heard)

10:00 a.m.
For Mention
David John Hurd
Samuel Alfred Watterson

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
A Witness

For Trial
FEP

Court 8, Salamanca, Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
In Court as in Chambers
For Bail Application by video link from Court 1, Supreme Court, Burnie
Tony Travers

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD

Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Equity Australia Corporation Pty Ltd
v
Mark Richerdson
(Part Heard)

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Jadwan Pty Ltd
v
Rae and Partners and Ors

4:00 p.m.
Directions Hearing by Telephone
Klingbeil and Anor
v
Gain

4:15 p.m.
Directions Hearing by Telephone
Mawer
v
E B Enterprises Pty Ltd t/a C2 Demolition and Ors

LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Mention
A Witness

To Follow For Trial (Part-Heard)
JAW

4:15pm For Hearing by Telephone
Ivan Mercer

v

Allianz Australia Insurance Limited

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00am For Application
Christine Joy Radford

To Follow For Hearing
Launceston City Council
v
Tasmanian Water and Sewerage (Northern Region) Pty Ltd trading as Ben Lomond Water

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice Estcourt
Criminal Jurisdiction
2.15pm
In Court
For Mention
David Fitzpatrick

For Legal Argument
KA

4.15pm
In Court as in Chambers by video link to Court 8, Supreme Court, Hobart
For Bail Application
Tony Travers

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 11 February 2015 [2015] TASSCCourtlist 21
Case
[2015] TASSCCourtlist 21
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of Equity Australia Corporation Pty Ltd v Mark Richerdson was heard in the Supreme Court of Tasmania, with the matter being presided over by Associate Justice Holt. The dispute involved Equity Australia Corporation Pty Ltd, the plaintiff, suing Mark Richerdson, the defendant, over a matter that was part-heard at the time of the report. The nature of the dispute was not specified in the case summary, leaving the specifics of the claim and the relief sought by the plaintiff undisclosed.

The legal issues that the court was required to decide pertain to the merits and procedures of the case, including the interpretation of any contractual or statutory obligations between the parties, the admissibility of evidence, and the application of relevant legal principles to the facts of the case. Given that this was a part-heard trial, the court would have been focused on laying the foundational legal and factual groundwork necessary for a full trial or for any subsequent rulings on interim matters.

The court's reasoning and outcome were not detailed in the case summary provided. The report only indicated that the matter was part-heard, suggesting that the court was in the early stages of hearing the evidence and arguments from both parties. Associate Justice Holt would have considered the procedural fairness, the weight of the evidence presented, and the applicable law in reaching any interim decisions or in preparing for the next stages of the trial. The final orders of the court, including any interim decisions or directions for the continuation of the trial, were not included in the summary.

The summary does not provide information on any final orders made by the court. It is likely that further hearings will be required to complete the trial and for the court to deliver its final judgment. The outcome of the case will depend on the resolution of the legal issues presented and the evidence that is ultimately accepted by the court.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.