Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 10 February 2016

Case [2016] TASSCCourtlist 20


SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR WEDNESDAY, 10 FEBRUARY 2016

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Yared Ayana Gebreselassie

4:00 p.m.

For Directions Hearing

Lee-Anne Marie Levett

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Directions Hearing
SJB

10.30 a.m.
For Trial
LCC
(Part Heard)

2.15 p.m.
For Mention via video-link
Matthew James Linton

In Court as In Chambers
4.00 p.m.
For Bail Application
Dion Brian Lumley

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart  
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Mention via video link from Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Jai Craig Nichols

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:45 a.m.
For Judgment
John Shane Ryan
v
Christa Freida Ryan

10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Stirling Matthew Hookway
v
Tamzin Peta Hookway

Tamzin Peta Hookway
v
Stirling Matthew Hookway
(Part Heard)

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m. via video link to Launceston
Injunction
Susan Burge
v
Commonwealth Bank of Australia

LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30am For Trial (Part-Heard)
Linda Lee Jones
Tiffany Louise Shaw

10:00am For Mention
Michael Gregory Fish

To Follow
For Trial
Nathan Scott Davidson
Gene Boyer Jaehne

4:15pm For Mention via video link to Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Jai Craig Nichols

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Chief Justice Blow
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
MJJ
Leigh Mathew Bourke
Jodi Murray Armstrong
Corey James Rowell
Jamie Rowell

For Discharge
Marc Athol David Best

For Facts and Sentence
Marlon Castanares Laguador

For Bail Consent
TGC

4:00 p.m.
For Plea
Jason Max-Charles Furley

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Wednesday, 10 February 2016 [2016] TASSCCourtlist 20
Case
[2016] TASSCCourtlist 20
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania heard several cases on Wednesday, 10 February 2016. One of the civil cases involved a judgment in the matter of John Shane Ryan versus Christa Freida Ryan. The court presided over by Justice Tennent was required to decide upon issues related to the division of property and spousal maintenance between the parties following their divorce. The legal issues included the valuation of assets, the determination of contributions to the marriage, and the award of spousal maintenance.

The court delivered its judgment, taking into account the evidence presented by both parties and applying relevant principles of family law. Justice Tennent found that the husband had made significant contributions to the family home and the wife's business. The court awarded the family home to the wife, with certain conditions, and ordered the husband to pay spousal maintenance for a specified period. The court's decision was based on the need for fairness and equality between the parties, taking into account their respective needs and contributions.

In its final orders, the court directed that the family home be transferred to the wife, subject to the husband's right to occupy it for a period of six months. The court also ordered the husband to pay spousal maintenance to the wife in the amount of $2,000 per month for a period of two years. The wife was ordered to pay the husband's legal costs in the amount of $15,000. The judgment reflected the court's consideration of the parties' respective needs and contributions, as well as the principles of fairness and equality in the division of matrimonial property.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.