SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR TUESDAY, 7 MAY 2013 HOBART Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction 4.00 p.m. For Mention Meaganne Glover Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart Before Associate Justice HOLT Civil Jurisdiction 9.30 a.m. Miscellaneous Civil Business LAUNCESTON No list for Launceston BURNIE No list for Burnie ______________________________________________________ (Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction 4.00 p.m. For Mention Meaganne Glover Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart Before Associate Justice HOLT Civil Jurisdiction 9.30 a.m. Miscellaneous Civil Business LAUNCESTON No list for Launceston BURNIE No list for Burnie ______________________________________________________ (Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
Details
- AGLC
- Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 7 May 2013 [2013] TASSCCourtlist 74
- Case
- [2013] TASSCCourtlist 74
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, a case was heard before Justice Wood concerning a dispute involving Meaganne Glover. The specifics of the dispute were not detailed in the text, but it was scheduled for mention in the criminal jurisdiction at 4:00 p.m. This court session was part of the Hobart court's regular business, held at Court 8, Salamanca Place. The legal issues that the court needed to address were not explicitly stated, but typically in a criminal mention, the court may be considering matters such as bail applications, plea arrangements, or updates on the status of a case.
The court's reasoning and outcome are not provided in the text, so it is unclear what decisions were made regarding Meaganne Glover's case. In a mention session, the court might have been tasked with reviewing procedural matters or making interim decisions that would influence the progression of the case. The absence of details on the court's reasoning and outcome means that the specific legal and factual determinations made by Justice Wood remain undisclosed.
If the case had any final orders or significant determinations, they were not included in the provided text. Typically, such orders might pertain to bail conditions, trial dates, or other procedural directives essential for the case's progression. The lack of final orders or detailed outcomes in this excerpt indicates that the case may have been at an early stage or that the final decisions were to be communicated separately.
The court's reasoning and outcome are not provided in the text, so it is unclear what decisions were made regarding Meaganne Glover's case. In a mention session, the court might have been tasked with reviewing procedural matters or making interim decisions that would influence the progression of the case. The absence of details on the court's reasoning and outcome means that the specific legal and factual determinations made by Justice Wood remain undisclosed.
If the case had any final orders or significant determinations, they were not included in the provided text. Typically, such orders might pertain to bail conditions, trial dates, or other procedural directives essential for the case's progression. The lack of final orders or detailed outcomes in this excerpt indicates that the case may have been at an early stage or that the final decisions were to be communicated separately.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.