Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 7 February 2012 Summary

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR TUESDAY, 7 FEBRUARY 2012

HOBART

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Justice BLOW

Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.For Trial
REM
(Part-heard)

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m. For Trial

Adam James Bishop
(Part heard)

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m. For Hearing

Jack William Court

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction

9:30 a.m. Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Chief Justice Crawford

Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00am For Trial
Kylie Maree Parker

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street Burnie before Justice Porter
Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 am
For Mention via video-link to Risdon Prison
Graham John Enniss

2.15 pm
For Plea
Stacey Lorrene Lee Archer

4:00 pm
For Preliminary Proceedings Application
Daryl John Heard

Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

This case involves a legal dispute that was to be heard in the Supreme Court of Tasmania. The proceedings were scheduled for Tuesday, 7 February 2012, across multiple locations and courts, including Hobart and Launceston. The specific cases involved both criminal and civil matters, with hearings scheduled before various justices and associates. Notably, some cases involved part-heard trials, indicating that these matters were ongoing and required further sessions to conclude.

The legal issues before the court encompassed a range of matters, from trials and pleas to preliminary proceedings applications. These issues would require the court to consider various legal principles, including evidentiary standards, procedural fairness, and the interpretation of statutes and case law. The outcomes of these hearings would depend on the evidence presented, the arguments made by the parties involved, and the application of relevant legal principles.

The reasoning and outcomes of the court were not detailed in the provided excerpt, but it is expected that each case would be addressed according to its specific facts and legal context. The court's decisions would be based on a thorough analysis of the evidence and legal arguments, ensuring that justice is served in accordance with the law. Given the nature of the Supreme Court, the decisions would likely set important precedents or clarify legal issues for future cases. The final orders and judgments would be documented in the court's official records.

Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 7 February 2012

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established