SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR TUESDAY, 5 APRIL 2016
HOBART
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:00 p.m.
For Sentence
Kenneth David Drake
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Sentence via video-link to Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Jodi Murray Armstrong
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
In Court as in Chambers
9:30 a.m.
For Application to Vary Bail via video link to Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Justin Joseph Ewell
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
2:15 p.m.
For Judgment
Nicolaas Ockert Bester
v
Alisha Barnes
Scott Wilkie
v
Marty James Fewkes
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
Miscellaneous Civil Business
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30am
In Court as in Chambers
For Application to Vary Bail via video link from Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Justin Joseph Ewell
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice Wood
10:00 a.m.
For Sentence
Jodi Murray Armstrong
______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 5 April 2016 [2016] TASSCCourtlist 65
- Case
- [2016] TASSCCourtlist 65
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was required to address various legal issues arising from these cases. In the criminal cases, the primary issue was the appropriate sentence to be imposed on the defendants, considering the circumstances and legal principles applicable to each case. The bail application involved assessing the risk factors and ensuring the conditions of bail were appropriate to safeguard the interests of the community and the defendant. In the civil cases, the court had to determine the outcomes of disputes between the parties, applying relevant statutes and legal precedents to resolve the matters at hand.
The court carefully considered the evidence and arguments presented in each case. For sentencing, the judges assessed the severity of the offences, the defendants' backgrounds, and any mitigating or aggravating factors. In the bail application, the court evaluated the risk of the defendant reoffending or failing to appear in court. In the civil cases, the judges applied legal principles to the facts of each dispute to reach a decision. The reasoning and outcomes varied with each case, reflecting the specific circumstances and legal issues involved. The final orders included the sentencing terms for Drake and Armstrong, conditions for Ewell's bail, and the resolutions for the civil disputes.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.