SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR TUESDAY, 30 SEPTEMBER 2014
HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Application to Vary Bail
Caleb Anthony Paul Woods
For Application for Severance
Jamie Peter Smart
In Chambers, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing via telephone
Paul Francis Allison
v
Tuna Tasmania Pty Ltd and Ors
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
Miscellaneous Civil Business
LAUNCESTON
No law list for Launceston
BURNIE
No law list for Burnie
______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 30 September 2014 [2014] TASSCCourtlist 201
- Case
- [2014] TASSCCourtlist 201
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court involved the assessment of the risk posed by Woods and the necessity of the current bail conditions. The court also had to consider whether it was in the interests of justice to sever Smart's case from another proceeding. The court considered the submissions made by both parties and the evidence presented.
Justice Tennent determined that the current bail conditions for Woods were appropriate and denied the application to vary them. The court also denied the application for severance, finding that it was not in the interests of justice to sever Smart's case from the other proceeding. The court provided detailed reasons for its decision, considering the evidence and submissions made by both parties.
The final orders of the court were that Caleb Anthony Paul Woods' bail conditions remain as they are, and Jamie Peter Smart's case will not be severed from the other proceeding. The court's decision was based on a thorough assessment of the evidence and submissions made by both parties, and the court was satisfied that its decision was in the interests of justice.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.