Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 3 November 2015

Case [2015] TASSCCourtlist 239


SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR TUESDAY, 3 NOVEMBER 2015

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial

Samuel Alfred Watterson

4:15 p.m.

In Court as in Chambers

For Directions Hearing

Bevin Irwin Swan

Royden Sydney Bevin Swan

Emma Joan Swan

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Trial
Matthew James Linton
(Part Heard)

4.15 p.m.
For Sentence via video-link
Alexander James Bartels
Philip Charles Harrison

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice Estcourt
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Mention via video-link to Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Pamela Ruth Hodshon

For Sentence via video-link to Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Katelyn Maree Triffett
Patrick Wayne Dixon

Chambers, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Civil Jurisdiction
11:30 a.m.
For Telephone Directions Hearing
Stirling Matthew Hookway
v
Tamzin Peta Hookway

Tamzin Peta Hookway
v
Stirling Matthew Hookway

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:45am For Trial (Part Heard)
Christopher John Humphreys
Luke James Reader

10:00am For Mention
John Benjamin Adams
Christina Vernessa Watson
Ashley John Bowley
Christopher John Glen Walker
Alexandra Rose Lockwood

In Court as In Chambers
4:00pm For Application to Revoke Bail
Ethen Wayne Nicholls (AKA Prem)

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE

Civil Jurisdiction
In Court as in Chambers
10:00am For Interlocutory Application
Louise Flynn v Paul Leslie Richardson

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice Estcourt
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Mention via video-link from Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Pamela Ruth Hodshon

For Sentence via video-link from Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Katelyn Maree Triffett
Patrick Wayne Dixon

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 3 November 2015 [2015] TASSCCourtlist 239
Case
[2015] TASSCCourtlist 239
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Samuel Alfred Watterson appeared in the Supreme Court of Tasmania before Justice Tennent, in the Criminal Jurisdiction, for a trial. The nature of the dispute was not detailed in the court list, but it is likely to be a criminal matter. Matthew James Linton's trial was also listed before Justice Wood, again in the Criminal Jurisdiction. The case was listed as part heard, and sentencing was scheduled for Alexander James Bartels and Philip Charles Harrison. Katelyn Maree Triffett and Patrick Wayne Dixon were scheduled for a mention via video-link to Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie, before Justice Estcourt.

The legal issues before the court would likely involve the admissibility of evidence, the interpretation of statutes and case law relevant to the charges, and the determination of guilt or innocence in the criminal cases. In the civil case, the court would have to decide on the interlocutory application brought by Louise Flynn against Paul Leslie Richardson. The court's role would be to interpret the relevant laws and facts presented to make a ruling.

The court's reasoning and outcome were not detailed in the court list. However, it is likely that the court would have considered the evidence presented, the arguments from both parties, and relevant legal precedents in making its decisions. The final orders would depend on the outcome of the cases and the specific legal issues at hand. These would be detailed in the court's judgment, which would be released at a later date.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.