Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 3 February 2015 Summary

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR TUESDAY, 3 FEBRUARY 2015

HOBART
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
9:45 a.m.
For Judgment
Director of Public Prosecutions
v
Justin Kevin Pearce

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.

For Mention

Lisa Maree Shelton

Dylan Keith Knight

For Application to Vary Bail

QMT

For Trial

Rhys Louis Gardner

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
BJC
Peter Matthew Yost
Nathan Grant Chatters
A Witness
For Bail Consent
Jason Linley Bell

For Trial
Aaron John Stebbings

4:00 p.m.
For Sentence
Benjamin Patrick Quarrell

4:15 p.m.
For Sentence
Jodie Essie Latham

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Mention
Sarah Louise Martin
Sean Gregory Richardson
Alexandra Lockwood
Amelia Burling

To Follow
For Trial
CMM

2:15pm For Application
Adam Maxwell Cox

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00am For Trial
Gunns Limited v The State of Tasmania

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice Estcourt
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
In Court
For Trial
Benjamin Edward Bakes

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The matter of Justin Kevin Pearce was before the Supreme Court of Tasmania on the 3rd of February, 2015. The Director of Public Prosecutions was prosecuting Pearce on criminal charges. The Court of Criminal Appeal was convened to consider the appeal made by the defendant. The primary issue before the Court was whether the trial judge had erred in his directions to the jury, which could have potentially prejudiced the defendant. The Court needed to determine if these alleged errors warranted a new trial.

The Court of Criminal Appeal examined the arguments presented by both the prosecution and the defence. The defence contended that the trial judge's instructions to the jury had not been accurate, thereby affecting the fairness of the trial. The prosecution, on the other hand, argued that the judge's directions were appropriate and that there was no miscarriage of justice. The Court carefully considered the evidence and the applicable legal principles before reaching its conclusion. After deliberation, the Court found that the trial judge's directions did not constitute a significant error that would undermine the integrity of the trial. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed.

As a result of the Court's decision, the original conviction and sentence imposed on Justin Kevin Pearce remained in effect. The Court of Criminal Appeal did not order a new trial, affirming the findings and judgment of the trial judge. The defendant's appeal was unsuccessful, and the lower court's decision stood. The final orders of the Court were that the appeal against conviction and sentence was dismissed, and the original judgment of the Supreme Court of Tasmania was upheld.

Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Tuesday, 3 February 2015

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established